Saturday, 25 February 2023

When Will Federal Reserve Stop Hiking Interest Rates? - vrk100 - 25Feb2023

When Will Federal Reserve Stop Hiking Interest Rates?

 
 

 
(Updated charts from Aug2024 onwards are available in India Forex Data Bank blog)
 
(Updates 02May2024, 21Mar2024, 02Nov2023 12Aug2023, 27Jul2023, 04May2023 and 23Mar2023 with new information are available at the end of the article)

 
 
The big question for global financial markets now is when will the US Federal Reserve (Fed) stop raising interest rates. Before we try to answer the question, let us understand what the Fed has done in the past two decades.

Table 1 below shows the hiking / easing cycles of the Fed:


What does one make of the above table? The question is answered in Table 2 below:


As shown above, we have seen four hiking cycles, three easing cycles and one neutral cycle when the Fed had kept the Federal Funds rate unchanged for seven long years. 
 
(story continues below)
 
------------------ 
 
Related Blogs: 

When Will Fed Raise Interest Rates?

Global Bond Yields, Negative Real Interest Rates and Soft Landing

 ------------------ 
 

It is important to understand another key aspect of a central bank's monetary policy. In addition to the tool of raising (tightening policy) or decreasing (easing policy) interest rates, other key tools used by central banks to rein in inflationary expectations are quantitative easing (QE) and quantitative tightening (QT).

Table 3 below shows how the size of the US Fed's balance sheet has expanded since September 2008 when the financial world was hit by Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and sub-prime crisis.


As delineated in Table 3, the Fed's balance sheet has increased by more than nine times since 2008, resulting in huge liquidity in markets. This massive liquidity has set off its own problems, leading to upsurge in asset prices, mainly those of equities, bonds, select commodities and collectibles.
 
One has to look at the combined picture of zero-bound interest rates (Table 1 and 2) and unconventional QE tool (Table 3) to understand their impact on financial markets globally. Easy money policies and massive purchase of bonds by the Fed (QE) had resulted in massive asset price rise the world over. 

In addition to the above easy monetary policies by the Fed, the US administrations (both under president Trump and president Biden) have provided fiscal stimulus to the US citizens to lessen the impact of COVID-19 Pandemic.

These measures had further boosted the asset prices globally till 2021. Afflicted by the supply chain bottlenecks, massive monetary and fiscal stimulus, Russian invasion of Ukraine, surge in commodity prices, wage pressures and many workers staying out of labour market post-COVID-19, inflation globally had gone up in 2022. 

Between 2000 and 2021, the consumer price inflation (CPI) for developed markets (DMs) was 1.5 percent annually, and if you include emerging markets (EMs), it was around 2.2 percent. 

But by the end of 2022, global inflation has surpassed 8 percent in most major nations, leading to a steep fall in stock and bond prices -- while some commodity prices, led by oil and gas, remained elevated. 

 
Current Monetary Tightening

The current monetary tightening started on two fronts in March of 2022. In the past 12 months, the Fed funds rate has gone up by 450 basis points to 4.50-4.75 percent range (Table 1 and 2); while the Fed's balance sheet has almost shrunk by USD 600 billion in the same period (Table 3).

The combined impact of higher interest rates and liquidity withdrawal on the global asset prices is severe in 2022. While stocks and bonds were negatively impacted, some commodities, like oil and gas, gained in 2022. 

The actual impact of these measures on the financial conditions is still in the pipeline. Monetary policy works with a lag of 12 to 15 months. Its impact is not yet fully reflecting in the earnings of US corporations.
 
 
Higher for Longer?

The US  CPI reached 41-year high of 9.1 percent in Jun2022, though it cooled off to 6.4 percent in Jan2023. The PCE inflation, the Fed's preferred metric of inflation, is 5.38 percent in Jan2023 -- much higher than the Fed's inflation target of 2 percent. 

Though US unemployment rate is at a 40-year low of 3.4 percent (Jan2023), the labour market continues to be tight in the US. 
 
Inverted yield curve: The 10-year US Treasury yield is 3.95 percent, but the 20-year yield is much higher at 4.81 percent -- with a negative spread of 86 percent. Such inverted yield curve phenomenon is considered as a harbinger of a recession.
 
The current speculation is the US will plunge into a recession in the next 12 months and may not experience a soft landing, according to market observers. However, these things are not predictable.  
 
Much will depend on incoming data as the Fed often says its future policies are 'data dependent.' 
 
Till two months ago, market was speculating that the Fed would stop hiking rates by mid-2023 and by end-2023, it would start decreasing interest rates (the so-called 'Fed pivot').
 
But the situation has changed in the past one month. As labour market conditions in the US continue to be tight and the US economic data is strong, the markets have stopped factoring in a Fed pivot at least in 2023. This has resulted in the US stocks losing their steam in the past four weeks. 

The current market buzzword is:'higher for longer.' Which means the Fed will keep raising rates to rein in persistent inflation and keep the rates higher longer than anticipated by the market.

This is an interesting dichotomy for the markets because: on the one hand, the Fed says it's data dependent; on the other hand, the markets currently believe the Fed's policies will remain hawkish.

The central banks are in the habit of not surprising markets in a nasty manner. They consider market reaction in tandem with the economic data and the prevailing financial conditions and set their policies accordingly. This has been the market experience at least in the past 25 to 30 years.

In my opinion, the stock and bond markets are too pessimistic about the Fed's policies. Let us see how the markets behave in the next two quarters.
 
Additional data from previous blog


 
- - -
 
 
The following brief notes / images added after publishing the above article on 25Feb2023:
 
P.S. dated 02May2024: The US Fed on 01May2024 kept its federal funds rate unchanged at 5.25%-5.50%. 
 
Yesterday, the Fed said: "... FOMC will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and MBS. Starting in June, FOMC will slow the pace of decline of its securities holdings by reducing the monthly redemption cap on Treasury securities from USD 60 bn to USD 25 billion."
 
As stated earlier, the slowing down of reduction in Fed balance sheet starting from Jun2024 is positive, in a big picture sense, for the markets. Simply put, with QE or Quantitative Easing, the Fed expanded its balance sheet by buying of Treasury securities and MBS.
 
With QT or quantitative tightening, the Fed is reducing its balance sheet via selling of Treasury Securities and agency MBS and most often allowing the bonds to run off on maturity of the bonds. What the Fed said yesterday was they would slow down the pace of the selling of securities -- which can be positive for bond prices, ceteris paribus.  
 

 
 
P.S. dated 21Mar2024: The US Fed on 20Mar2024 kept its federal funds rate unchanged at 5.25%-5.50%. The market sees Fed chair Powell's statement as bullish for both stocks, gold and silver.
 
S&P 500 index hit all time high y'day, after FOMC decision to hold interest rates steady. 
 
Market interpretation of Fed Chair Powell's press conference comments: the pace of QT (quantitative tightening) will slow 'fairly soon.' 
 
Slower pace of QT could be positive for markets.



 
P.S. dated 02Nov2023: The US Fed on 01Nov2023 kept its federal funds rate unchanged at 5.25%-5.50%. 
 

 

 
P.S. dated 12Aug2023: What is the impact of Fed's monetary tightening on the US economy?
 
The Fed's current upward rate cycle started in Mar2022 and still continuing. During the period (17 months), the Fed funds rate has gone up by 525 basis points from almost zero percent. Combined with rate hikes, the Fed started quantitative tightening (QT) in Apr2022. In the past 16 months, Fed's balance sheet size decreased from USD 8,965 billion to USD 8,208 billion now, a decrease of just 8.4 percent.

It may be mentioned, during the QE period of Feb2020 to Apr2o22, Fed balance sheet grew by 115 percent -- so the decrease of just 8.4 percent in QT period is piffling. The impact of QT on US economy thus can be characterised as psychological rather than real.

The US CPI inflation peaked in Jun2022 at 9.1 percent. Due mainly to interest rate hikes and QT, the inflation dropped to 3 percent by Jun2023, before increasing to 3.2 percent in Jul2023. From Jul2023, the base effect started and inflation print inched up a little. 
 
By Dec2022, US inflation number dropped to 6.5 percent. So, between now and the end of the Dec2023, one may not expect further steep drop in US inflation -- that too in the backdrop of crude oil prices reaching levels of USD 83 - 87 per barrel, the highest in nine months.
 
The US unemployment rate barely budged, from 3.6 percent in Mar2022 to 3.5 percent now, during the current monetary tightening cycle -- while labour force participation rate slightly increased from 62.4 percent to 62.6 percent in the same period. 
 
One area where the Fed's monetary tightening has impacted US public is the steep increase in 30-year average fixed mortgage rate -- an increase of 320 basis points from 3.76 percent in Mar2022 to 6.96 percent now. The steep increase has negatively impacted the demand for new houses.

As per media reports repeated incessantly in the past 18 months, the US economy was supposed to experience a recession -- but recession is nowhere to be seen with US GDP real growth growing between 1.5 and 2 percent in recent quarters -- though the recession may knock at the US at some point in future. 

There is some link, as seen in the past periods, between recessions and yield curve inversion, at least in the US. Since Jul2022, the US yield curve is in inversion (Fred graph below), meaning, for example, the 2-year Treasury note yield has been higher than the 10-year Treasury note yield continuously for the past 13 months. 
 
Now, the media have stopped talking about inverted yield curve, because their talk of US recession has failed to materialise even after 18 months.





Updated charts of Fed monetary tightening cycles in Table 1, 2 and 3 >





 
 
 
P.S. dated 27Jul2023: The US Fed on 26Jul2023 raised its federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 5.25%-5.50%. 
 

 
 
 

P.S. dated 04MAY2023: The US Fed on 03May2023 raised its federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 5.00%-5.25%. 
 
This is the 10th consecutive rate hike by the Fed since the upward rate cycle started in Mar2022. 
 

 
 
 
P.S. dated 23Mar2023: The US Fed on 22Mar2023 raised its federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 4.75%-5.00%.
 

 
 
References:
 
US Fed Balance Sheet Size historical data
 
-------------------
 
Read more:  
 
 Why Do Indian Equity Mutual Funds Always Disappoint Investors?

Adani Stocks Meltdown and Nifty Next 50 Index

Are Indian Stocks Immune to Adani stock Meltdown?

Meltdown in Adani group Listed Stocks

JP Morgan Guide to Markets

Why the Divergence Between Sensex and Nifty 50 in Today's Trade?

Indian Stock Market Moves Fully to T+1 Settlement

NSE Indices Comparison 31Dec2022

BSE 500 vs S&P 500 Indices Compare 31Dec2022

Nifty 50 Index Yearly Movement 31Dec2022

India Up the Ladder in MSCI EM Index 

New Rules on Ex-date and Record date

Crisil Report - Big Shift in Financialisation 

Weblinks and Investing

-------------------

Disclosure:  I've vested interested in Indian stocks and other investments. It's safe to assume I've interest in the financial instruments / products discussed, if any.

Disclaimer: The analysis and opinion provided here are only for information purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should consult their own financial advisers before making any investments. The author is a CFA Charterholder with a vested interest in financial markets. 

CFA Charter credentials  - CFA Member Profile

CFA Badge

 

He blogs at:

https://ramakrishnavadlamudi.blogspot.com/

https://www.scribd.com/vrk100

Twitter @vrk100 

Wednesday, 22 February 2023

Why Do Indian Equity Mutual Funds Always Disappoint Investors? - vrk100 - 22Feb2023

Why Do Indian Equity Mutual Funds Always Disappoint Investors?

 

 


 

 

(Updates 10Apr2024, 11Oct2023 and 12Apr2023 are available at the end of the article)

 

 


 

Actively managed equity mutual funds in India are one of the worst performing against their respective benchmarks; as compared to the performance of  other major countries across the globe.

You take any asset class, be it stocks or bonds or gold, mutual funds not only in India but the world over, underperform their benchmark indices by a wide margin. 
 
I've highlighted the underperformance of Indian equity funds in the past. You can check my previous blogs mentioned below.

 

(story continues below)
 
------------------
Related Blogs: 
 
Indian Mutual Funds and the Art of Ripping off Investors
 
Who is Eating My Gold ETF Return?
 
 Mutual Fund Asset Class Returns 31Dec2022

------------------

 

What Experts Say


Several research studies done over 55 years have found mutual funds underperforming well diversified benchmark indices. The first comprehensive study of mutual funds' performance was done by Michael C. Jensen covering 115 mutual funds over 10 years from 1955 to 1964. 
 
As per Jensen's study, only 26 of the 115 funds (23 percent of total) outperformed the market. On average, the underperformance of mutual funds for ten years was 15 percent. Absent loading charges (commissions paid by investors to mutual fund brokers), the loss of wealth was 8.9 percent with 43 of the 115 funds (37 percent) outperforming the market. 

Veteran market researchers and money managers, like Charles D. Ellis, Burton Malkiel and late David Swensen too have outlined why active money managers routinely fail to beat well diversified benchmark indices. 
 
Institutional and professional money managers tend to follow the crowd and hold the stocks that are part of the major indices, like, Dow Jones, S&P 500, Nasdaq or FTSE 100. Their portfolios look like any passive portfolio tracking a benchmark index (known as index hugging). 
 
Most of the time, they tend to chase stocks that are hot favourites currently. They often have high portfolio turnover, churning the portfolio of stocks too often.  (see post script)
 
After fund fees, these money managers are unable to beat the market.
 

SPIVA Reports

S&P Dow Jones Indices for over 20 years has done pioneering work on documenting the performance of actively managed mutual funds versus the benchmark indices. Their research covers most markets globally. These reports are known as SPIVA (S&P Indices Versus Active Funds). 
 
The following three tables highlight the performance of equity mutual funds in India as pointed out by SPIVA reports. As per the reports, more than 80 percent of equity funds fail to beat the returns of their benchmark indices over most of the time periods. 
 
I've analysed how Indian equity funds performed over a period of five years from 2018 to 2022 -- covering large-cap, ELSS (equity linked savings schemes) and mid-/small-cap funds -- for one-, three-,  five- and 10-year periods. 
 
Data in these tables are based on absolute returns (not on risk-adjusted returns). Latest data available from SPIVA are as of 30Jun2022 (report for 31Dec2022 may come out in Apr2023).


Table 1: Indian equity large-cap funds' underperformance:


As shown above, as of 30Jun2022, 91 percent of large-cap funds underperformed, on a one-year basis, the benchmark index, namely BSE 100. On a 10-year basis, the performance of active funds looks slightly better with 67 percent of large-cap funds underperforming as on 30Jun2022.

The underperformance of active funds is similar for other time periods, between 2018 and 2021. Only in COVID-19 outbreak year (30Jun2020), 52 percent active funds outperformed the BSE 100 on one-year returns basis. 


Table 2: Indian equity ELSS funds' underperformance:

 

 

As compared to large-cap funds, ELSS funds seemed to have done better than BSE 200 index for periods between 2018 and 2021 when compared on a 10-year returns basis.  But the overall underperformance of ELSS is similar to that of large-cap funds for 1-year, 3-year and 5-years returns in all time periods between Jun2018 and Jun2022.

 

Table 3: Indian equity Mid-/Small-cap funds' performance:

 

The performance of mid- and small-cap funds looks interesting. On a one-year returns basis, as on 30Jun2022, 30Jun2020 and 30Jun2019, majority of these funds, as shown in Table 3 above, have done better than their benchmark index, that is, BSE 400 MidSmallCap index. 
 
For example, as on 30Jun2019, 81 percent of mid-/small-cap funds outperformed their benchmark index on a one-year basis; and 73 percent of funds outperformed the index on a 5-year basis.

On a 10-year basis, majority of these funds performed better than their benchmark index between Jun2019 and Jun2022. 


Investment Implications


So, making money by mutual funds or asset management companies (AMCs) based on good performance is tough; so, they resort to asset-gathering abandoning asset management altogether -- asset gathering seems to be the only way left for them in order to make money for themselves, if not for unitholders of mutual funds.
 
You may have observed that AMCs in recent years have been floating a plethora of passive funds (index funds and ETFs or exchange traded funds), most of which are unsuitable for a common investor. (see post script)
 
Fund managers are afraid of holding off-beat stocks that are neglected by markets. They are most of the time chasing relative performance -- comparing themselves with other fund managers' performance. 
 
If you observe the portfolios of equity mutual funds in India, you may have noticed some funds hold more than 70 to 80 stocks in their portfolios. In addition, these schemes tend to hold a large number of stocks with less than two percent of their total assets of the scheme in a single stock. (see post script)
 
To be fair to them, I would add that Indian stock markets lack depth and liquidity as compared to the US or European markets. As such, to avoid liquidity risk, some large funds tend to hold a large number of stocks. Naturally, these schemes suffer from over-diversification resulting in lower returns for investors / unitholders. 
 
Indian mutual funds in recent years have been facing competition from alternative investment funds (AIFs) and portfolio management services (PMS).

And, Indians seem to be investing their surplus more in foreign funds, stocks and other asset classes (within the USD 250,000 limit permitted in India under the LRS or Liberalised Remittance Scheme). 
 
All the above are negative for shareholders of listed AMCs in India, because competition within and outside India has been working against the mutual fund industry (now, there are five listed AMCs in India). And the same can be said overall for the unitholders of active mutual funds managed by these AMCs.  
 
Put differently: the chances of actively managed funds beating the market are low to moderate and the chances of getting decent returns from stocks of listed AMCs is tough going forward.

But passive flows, via monthly systematic investment plans (SIPs), Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) and insurance companies, come automatically -- which will continue to be a positive for the mutual funds. 
 
  
Summing Up

That equity mutual funds in India fail to beat market returns is a given. That doesn't mean no mutual fund scheme can beat the market. There are always some exceptional money managers -- but it's hard for unitholders to identify them in advance.

Moreover, it's difficult to find fund managers who can beat the market consistently over longer periods, say, 10 to 20 or even 30 years. Here, I'm not even talking about manager churn -- meaning money managers often jump from one mutual fund company to another. So, tracking such managers and funds is arduous.
 
Most investors will be better off holding passive funds (that is, index and / or exchange traded funds or ETFs) rather than active mutual funds. If you're able to identify well-performing active mid- and small-cap funds, you may pick up these funds based on your risk appetite and investment goals; though small- and mid-cap funds entail greater risks.

 
 

 - - -

Update 10Apr2024:

S&P Dow Jones Indices (part of S&P Global) on 28Mar2024 released a new India SPIVA Report on Indian mutual funds, with data as at the end of 31Dec2023. The new data (all data presented here are based on absolute return basis, not on risk-adjusted return basis) are presented in the following updated tables >
 
India's large-cap and mid/small cap funds continue their underperformance as on 31Dec2023 also. 
 
Compared to 30Jun2023 data, on a 1-year basis, large cap funds' performance improved with only 52% (83% underperformance as on 30Jun2023) of active funds underperforming the benchmark BSE 100 index.
 
However, on a 3-, 5- and 10-year basis, active funds' gross underperformance continues with 88%,  86% and 62% active funds underperforming respectively versus the benchmark.
 
A pleasant surprise is only 30% of ELSS funds underperformed the benchmark index on a 1-year basis, though more than 50% of active ELSS funds underperformed on a 3-, 5- and 10-year basis (put differently, 70% of ELSS funds outperformed their benchmark on a 1-year basis, which is quite impressive).  
 
Please check the data for large-cap, ELSS and Mid/Small-cap funds in the updated charts below > 

 




Update 11Oct2023:

S&P Dow Jones Indices (part of S&P Global) on 10Oct2023 released a new India SPIVA Report on Indian mutual funds, with data as at the end of 30Jun2023. The new data (all data presented here are based on absolute return basis, not on risk-adjusted return basis) are presented in the following updated tables >
 
India's large-cap and mid/small cap funds continue their underperformance as on 30Jun2023 also. 
 
On a 1-year basis, 83 percent of large-cap funds underperformed the benchmark index, i.e., BSE 100; though on a 10-year basis, only 61 percent of funds underperformed the benchmark.
 
When it comes to mid/small cap funds, 78 percent of funds underperformed the benchmark index, i.e., BSE 400 MidSmallCap index; but on a 5-year basis, their performance looks better with only 38 percent of funds underperforming the benchmark. 

What is peculiar here is mid- and small-cap stocks have done well in Apr-Jun2023 quarter; but the underperformance of mid- and small-cap mutual funds, on a 1-year basis, is very high at 78 percent -- which is the highest in the past three years.

The stand-out performance of this SPIVA report as on 30Jun2023 is that of ELSS funds. On a 1-year basis, only 34 percent of ELSS fund underperformed the benchmark index -- to put differently, 66 percent of ELSS funds outperformed the benchmark index on a 1-year basis.
 



 

 
 

Update 12Apr2023:

S&P Dow Jones Indices (part of S&P Global) on 11Apr2023 released a new India SPIVA Report on Indian mutual funds, with data as at the end of 31Dec2022. The new data (all data presented here are based on absolute return basis, not on risk-adjusted return basis) are presented in the following updated tables >
 
Key highlights as of 31Dec2022:
 
> majority of Indian equity mutual funds continue to fail the benchmark indices
 
> bond mutual funds fared the best, with only 45 percent of funds underperforming the indices
 
> among all the equity categories, Mid-/Small-Cap equity funds fared the best by far in the long run, with exactly 50 percent of them beating the benchmark index over the 10-year period
 







 

P.S. 23Feb2023: 

1) Large holdings by mutual funds: For example, Kotak Balanced Advantage Fund, managed by Harish Krishnan, Abhishek Bisen and Hiten Shah, has got 100 stocks (excluding debt securities) in its portfolio as on 31Jan2023 -- of which, 79 stocks have individual stakes less than one percent of total assets. It's unfathomable why these fund managers hold such a large number of stocks in their portfolios. There are several such equity oriented funds.

2) ETF Assets: ETF assets (other than gold ETFs) swelled from Rs 28,800 crore in Dec.2016 to Rs 497,000 crore in Dec.2022 -- a staggering annual growth rate of 60.7 percent in six years! 


 

3) It is fair to say fund managers are bedeviled by large inflows and outflows from unitholders -- so, in order to manage the flows, they need to do some sell trades and buy trades (resulting in portfolio turnover) -- fund managers have no control over such involuntary trades.


References:

'The School of Athens' by Raphael - Wikimedia Commons

Capital Ideas: The Improbable Origins of Modern Wall Street by Peter L Bernstein

SPIVA Library (S&P Global) - region-wise (India included) / mutual fund underperformance - SPIVA reports 

India SPIVA report - as on 30Jun2022 PDF (released on 12Oct2022) -- India SPIVA as on 31Dec2021 PDF (released on 13Apr2022) -- mutual fund underperformance

SPIVA report BSE (available only till mid-year 2021) - year-end 2021 PDF report -- India SPIVA scorecards are available only since Dec.2013. 

SPIVA World Report 30Jun2022


-------------------

Read more:  

Adani Stocks Meltdown and Nifty Next 50 Index

Are Indian Stocks Immune to Adani stock Meltdown?

Meltdown in Adani group Listed Stocks

JP Morgan Guide to Markets

Why the Divergence Between Sensex and Nifty 50 in Today's Trade?

Indian Stock Market Moves Fully to T+1 Settlement

NSE Indices Comparison 31Dec2022

BSE 500 vs S&P 500 Indices Compare 31Dec2022

Nifty 50 Index Yearly Movement 31Dec2022

India Up the Ladder in MSCI EM Index 

New Rules on Ex-date and Record date

Crisil Report - Big Shift in Financialisation 

Weblinks and Investing

-------------------

Disclosure:  I've vested interested in Indian stocks and other investments. It's safe to assume I've interest in the financial instruments / products discussed, if any.

Disclaimer: The analysis and opinion provided here are only for information purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should consult their own financial advisers before making any investments. The author is a CFA Charterholder with a vested interest in financial markets. 

CFA Charter credentials  - CFA Member Profile

CFA Badge

 

He blogs at:

https://ramakrishnavadlamudi.blogspot.com/

https://www.scribd.com/vrk100

Twitter @vrk100