One question that
tickled my mind in recent months was why the US
inflation is low even though the US Federal Reserve has flooded its
economy with fiat money. I’m no expert on economics. Nor do I have any great
understanding of the dynamics of the US economy. Anyway, let me make an
attempt.
What is Inflation?
Inflation rates go up when prices go up. Too many dollars
are chasing lesser quantity of goods and services pushing up their prices. As
prices rise, the value of your money falls. One of the key factors influencing
inflation is money supply (See notes 2 to
8 below). Other factors could be expectations, fiscal deficit, economic
activity, investment by firms, wages and others.
“Inflation in a fiat money world is difficult to
suppress,” opined Alan Greenspan, the former chair of the US Fed. Fiat money or
fiat currency is simply paper money printed by a central bank on behalf of a
government and released to the economy. One important feature of fiat money is
that the governments have enormous power to create or destroy this paper money.
For several decades though, the world has been experiencing a very large
creation of paper money, but not its destruction.
The dynamics of the world economy have changed enormously
and in several ways in the last two to three decades. Inflation has, more or
less, remained low in many advanced economies, like, the US , the UK and the eurozone countries. For
over two decades, Japan
has suffered deflation—decrease in price levels. In the last six months or so,
the Asian giant seems to be coming out of deflationary trends after Japan decided
to double its monetary base.
The Standard Medicine in the US :
What does the US Fed do in order to stimulate
a weak economy? In normal times, the Fed eases monetary policy by lowering its
target for the short-term policy interest rate, the federal funds rate. And to
tame inflationary pressures, the Fed raises short-term interest rates, which
makes the money costlier to borrow. This is the standard medicine.
The US
has zero-bound interest rates (federal funds rate of 0 to 0.25 percent) since
December 2008. Theoretically, the record-low interest rates would have
stimulated credit growth and resulted in a gradual increase in inflation. But
none of this has happened in the US in the last five years since the
global financial crisis.
Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon,
said noted economist Milton Friedman. His argument was that to contain
inflationary pressures, you’ve to first restrain the money supply. However,
using this tool to control inflation is considered blunt. Interestingly, the
importance of money supply in stoking or subduing inflationary pressures has
diminished in the US
in the recent past (See notes 7 and 8
below).
After the 2007/2008 global financial
crisis, the Fed has been trying to stimulate the US economy
with its easy money policy. As part of the quantitative easing (QE) program, the
Fed has been buying bonds as it cannot lower its interest rates below the
present 0 to 0.25 percent. As a result of the unconventional QE program, the
monetary base in the US
has gone up by almost four times in the last six years or so.
But the US inflation rate has been at an
annual average of around 1.5 percent in the past five years. When the monetary base has gone up
four times and the interest rates have been kept close to zero percent in the
last five years, why is that the US inflation rate has been below the US Fed’s
comfort level of two percent?
The Answer is:
1. The money
pumped in by the US Fed has reached banks. But the banks are holding the funds
as excess reserves, instead of lending them; and these reserves are again kept
with the Fed! Of late, the Fed has been paying interest on these reserves to
banks and other financial institutions.
So, the banks find it more attractive
to receive interest from the Fed rather than lend to households or businesses.
The lending is not happening as the economy is weak. It’s no surprise that the
growth in the US
national income too is below two percent in recent years and unemployment rate
continues to be at more than 7 percent.
2. The US households’ savings rate was close to zero
percent prior to 2008, but now it’s anemic at around three to four percent of
GDP. Household debt was very high prior to 2008. After the global financial
crisis, wage incomes are down for many millions of US citizens.
They want to save more rather than spend their money. The US households
have been focused on reducing their debt, rather than increasing personal
consumption. Consumer consumption
growth is a dominant factor in the US economy. Of late, consumer
consumption growth too is anemic at less than two percent. So, the
deleveraging continues in the US
economy resulting in low inflation, while the unemployment rate continues to
remain at elevated levels.
3. The balance sheets of many
US
companies are very healthy and they are awash with liquid money. As they aren’t
sure about the prospects of US
economy, they’ve been using their excess cash to repurchase (buyback) shares
rather than invest in new plant and machinery or creating new jobs.
The tech-giant Microsoft has
announced a $40-billion share buyback recently. The company has increased its
dividend also. Companies, like, Apple, Merck, GE, Home Depot, Time Warner and
3M, too have offered/undertaken share buybacks in the past six months to one
year.
Relation between money supply and inflation
becomes tenuous now:
Evidence in the past indicated that there was
a strong connection between money supply and inflation rates. But history need
not repeat itself. This strong connection becomes tenuous now, at least in the US . (See notes 7 and 8 below).
The US Fed has been preparing the world
markets for unwinding of its asset purchases, by floating “balloons” since May
this year, when they first talked about tapering. When the markets reacted
violently—after the talk of tapering started— resulting in the steep decline in
prices of bonds, shares, commodities and large scale outflow of funds from the
emerging markets; the Fed, the ECB and the IMF tried to assuage the markets by
communicating that they would continue their easy money policies as long as the
economic growth remains weak.
At the same time, the Fed wants the unwinding
of highly risky and levered positions in the markets. (It may be recalled the
easy money available in the US
and other nations moved to commodities and non-US markets, especially emerging
markets, for achieving higher yields).
Between May and the middle of September this
year, many such highly levered positions have already been unwound. Now that
the markets have already experienced this fall due to talk of tapering; the
market’s future reaction may be muted once the Fed starts actual tapering of
its bond buying program.
Finally:
It is inevitable that the US interest
rates have to go up one day. It won’t be a surprise if the inflation rises in
the next 12 to 18 months above the US Fed’s comfortable level of two percent. The
world is deluged with dollars printed by the US Fed. Investors have borrowed
money at lower rates in the US
and invested the money in emerging markets and others in their quest for higher
yields. As we have seen in the last four months, the unwinding of levered bets
has created problems not only for the emerging economies, such as, India and
Indonesia (See note 9 below); but
also to investors themselves.
The US
banks have to start lending their excess reserves once the US economy
picks up momentum and the demand for money grows. The concerns that the
inflation in the US
and other developed world will rear its head once again are genuine.
Related:
References: US Fed FAQs; “The Age of Turbulence” by Alan Greenspan
Photos above are courtesy of US Fed. Left is Marriner S Eccles Bldg of
the Fed and right is Fed board room.
Disclaimer: The author is an investment analyst, equity
investor and freelance writer. This write-up is for information purposes only
and should not be taken as investment advice. Investors are advised to consult
their financial advisor before taking any investment decisions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
1.
The US Federal Reserve (US
Fed) is the central bank of the US
2. Money supply:
It is a group of assets that households and business can use to make payments
and to hold as short-term investments. One way to calculate money supply in the
US
is to aggregate currency and balances held in checking accounts and savings
accounts.
3. Monetary base, M1 and M2 are various ways to measure money
supply.
4. Monetary base:
It is the sum of currency in circulation and reserve balances (deposits held by
banks and other depository institutions in their accounts at the US Fed).
5. M1: It is the
sum of currency held by the public and transaction deposits at depository
institutions (which are financial institutions that obtain their funds mainly
through deposits from the public, such as commercial banks, savings and loan
associations, savings banks, and credit unions).
6. M2: is defined as M1 plus savings deposits,
small-denomination time deposits (those issued in amounts of less than
$100,000), and retail money market mutual fund shares.
7. For several decades in the past, central banks
including the US Fed used these measures of the money supply as an important
guide for conducting its monetary policy because these measures used to have
fairly close relationships with other factors such as, gross domestic product
(GDP) and price level. Based partly on these relationships, some economists—like
Milton Friedman—argued that the money supply provided important information
about the near-term course for the economy and determines the level of prices
and inflation in the long run.
8. However, these relationships between the money
supply measures and GDP and inflation in the US have been quite unstable. As a
result, the importance of the money supply as a guide for the conduct of
monetary policy in the United
States has diminished over time. The Fed
regularly reviews money supply data in conducting monetary policy, but money
supply figures are just part of a variety of data points it takes into account.
9. Fragile Five: Morgan Stanley
described five countries—Brazil ,
India , Indonesia , South
Africa and Turkey —as the “Fragile Five.” These
countries are facing outflow of funds due to the fear of US Fed tapering. More
over, these nations are experiencing severe current account deficits and
political risk. All these nations are going to the polls next year and
investors are focusing too much on political risk in these countries.
-
- -
No comments:
Post a Comment