Friday, 2 January 2026

FPIs Said Goodbye, Retail Kept Mum, DIIs Stayed Strong: India’s 2025 Market Story

FPIs Said Goodbye, Retail Kept Mum, DIIs Stayed Strong: India’s 2025 Market Story 02Jan2026



 
 

(The views expressed here are for information purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation or investment advice. While the author is a CFA Charterholder with nearly 25 years of experience in financial markets, this content is intended to share general insights and does not constitute financial guidance. Please consult your financial adviser before taking any investment decision. Safe to assume the author has a vested interest in stocks / investments discussed if any.)



FPI Flows and Market Impact

The conventional wisdom in India over the past few years has been that foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) are losing influence on domestic equities because domestic institutional investors (DIIs) have grown in size and market influence. 

However, the experience in calendar year 2025 challenges that notion. 

FPIs net sold Indian stocks worth Rs 1.66 lakh crore, a substantial outflow (in fact, this is the highest outflow in rupee terms, without adjusting for India's total market capitalisation which too has grown substantially). 

The market narrative, including retail investor behavior, suggests that such FPI exits still carry significant weight. 

NSE data till 30Nov2025 show retail investors themselves net sold shares worth Rs 1,000 crore (in the secondary market), which, although smaller, indicates sentiment contagion: FPI exits are likely influencing domestic investor psychology, causing even individual investors to retreat.

In fact, retail investors bought shares worth more than Rs 4.50 lakh crore between 2020 and 2024, as per NSE data.

As an aside, retail investors appear to have found better opportunities in gold, silver, primary market, unlisted shares, foreign stocks and crypto currencies. It's common knowledge investing is all about alternatives and your willingness to tag along.

For the first 11 months of 2025, DIIs invested Rs 7.09 lakh crores, which is the highest inflow in history, indicating they acted as a counterweight to FPIs. 

One could also argue without this huge DII inflow, markets indeed would have delivered negative returns overall in 2025. 

Narrative Forces Against Markets

Several negative factors compounded in 2025, creating strong headwinds for equities:

The 50% Trump tariffs imposed by the US triggered trade tensions, hurting investor confidence in Indian exports.

The rupee depreciated against major currencies, making foreign investors wary of currency risk.

Indian stocks were broadly considered overvalued by multiple measures, reducing the margin of safety for investment.

FPIs were consistent net sellers, exacerbating bearish sentiment throughout the year. Out of 249 trading days in Indian equity market in 2025, they sold on 170 days—nearly 7 out of 10 days—keeping pressure on markets.

Government and capital market regulator SEBI measures to curb speculation in futures & options further reduced leverage-driven liquidity.

These “forces against” combined created both actual and psychological pressures on the market. 

Even with positive domestic fundamentals, the narrative-driven selling by FPIs and subsequent retail caution had an outsized impact.

Forces Supporting the Market

On the other hand, domestic fundamentals were more or less strong:

GST rate cuts encouraged consumption, supporting corporate revenues.

Income tax reductions for the middle class increased disposable incomes, boosting domestic demand.

RBI’s aggressive monetary easing, including a 125 basis points rate cut and liquidity injections via OMO purchases and USD INR swaps, should have supported equities.

Official GDP growth estimates exceeding 8 per cent indicated a robust economic backdrop.

These factors suggested that, in theory, the market could have absorbed external shocks if domestic investor confidence remained high.

Why Negative Forces Dominated

Despite favorable domestic policies, the negative factors prevailed. FPIs’ large-scale selling acted as a catalyst for a broader market downtrend. 

Even strong GDP growth and monetary easing were insufficient to offset concerns about valuation, international trade risks and speculative constraints. 

Retail investor behavior confirms this sentiment shift: domestic participants did not counterbalance FPI outflows strongly enough. 

The market outcome—Indian equities performing poorly in CY 2025 versus global peers—highlights that global capital flows still matter significantly, especially when negative sentiment becomes self-reinforcing feedback loop.

Calendar year 2025 demonstrates that while DIIs and domestic factors provide structural support, FPIs remain influential, particularly when selling is large-scale and media narratives amplify the risk perception. 

Research shows that FPI flows do affect Indian stock performance, but they often operate in combination with DII flows and market fundamentals.

In calm periods, domestic investors and fundamentals can dominate; in stress periods (for example, global selloffs), foreign flows tend to have stronger influence.

Domestic growth, policy support and liquidity measures create a floor, but they cannot fully neutralise negative global sentiment and valuation concerns. In practical terms, FPI behavior seems to be a significant indicator for market psychology in India.



2026 Market Outlook: Optimism sparked by weak sentiment

Weak sentiment can, at times, create opportunities because assets often fall below their fair value, allowing investors to buy at a discount. Extreme pessimism can signal that most bad news is already priced in, limiting further downside. 

Even when prices drop, strong fundamentals like earnings and GDP growth remain intact, supporting potential recovery. Stabilising forces such as DIIs or policy measures can give cautious investors confidence in a rebound. 

Any eventual win-win trade deal between India and the US and rupee appreciation could turn the sentiment for the better.

In this way, weak sentiment can paradoxically spark optimism among those focused on long-term value.


FPIs exited aggressively, retail remained hesitant, while DIIs were supportive.

Despite strong domestic growth, liquidity and tax cuts, the market underperformed due to global uncertainty and negative sentiment.

 
This sets the stage for why 2026 outlook cannot ignore both global and domestic factors.

Factors Likely to Influence 2026

1. FPI Flows

After heavy selling in 2025, FPIs may reassess India in 2026 depending on global risk sentiment, interest rates abroad and currency stability.

A weaker rupee or global volatility could trigger another wave of FPI caution. RBI forex intervention needs to be watched closely.

Conversely, attractive valuations after 2025 underperformance could lure some re-entry.

2. Domestic Institutional and Retail Sentiment

DIIs, having supported the market through 2025, may continue to provide stability, especially if policy remains favorable (equity mutual funds still hold significant cash in their portfolios).

Retail participation could pick up if market corrections create buying opportunities and confidence improves.

3. Macroeconomic and Policy Factors

GDP growth in 2025–26 is expected to remain robust (7–8% range), supporting corporate earnings -- though there appears to be some obvious disconnect between economic growth and corporate profits.

RBI policies: Continued accommodative rates and liquidity support may underpin equities, but any unexpected tightening could trigger volatility.

Government reforms or fiscal measures (GST, tax policies, infrastructure spending) could stimulate sectors differently, creating selective opportunities.

4. Global Headwinds

Trade tensions, US interest rate policies or geopolitical shocks could influence FPIs and broader market sentiment.

Global risk-off episodes often have a short-term but sharp impact on Indian equities. Any truce between Russia and Ukraine, brokered by the combined West, could boost sentiment for financial markets. And such a truce could act against gold / silver speculation tilting investors back to equities. 

Likely Scenarios

Base Case: Stable domestic growth, moderate FPI inflows and markets recover gradually from 2025 weakness.

Optimistic Case: Global conditions improve, FPIs return, DIIs continue support and retail confidence rises may set the stage for market to rebound sharply.

Pessimistic Case: Global volatility persists, rupee weakens, FPIs continue cautious stance leading to domestic sentiment faltering and markets remaining lacklustre or range-bound.

Cautious optimism is warranted: 

India’s economic fundamentals remain firm, but global sentiment and FPI flows could sway the market. As in 2025, DIIs are likely to provide stability, while retail and FPI behavior could shape the market’s short-term moves. Certain sectors—like consumption, defence, pharmaceuticals and technology may outperform even if broader indices remain volatile. 

(This is just for educational purposes; and should not be construed as investment recommendation. Readers should consult their own financial advisers before considering any investments.)

 

- - - 

 


----------------

Read more:

Blog of Blogs Theme-wise 
 
Weblinks and Investing
 
India Fixed Income Data Bank
 
Indian Economy Data Bank 

India Forex Data Bank 
 
Who is Eating my Gold ETF Return? (gold data / gold ETF data)
 
Corporate Groups and Listed Companies 29Dec2024
 
Corporate Governance Concerns - Indian Companies 13Dec2024
 
Stocks and Peer Comparison by Industry 16Feb2024  
 
various uploads on Scribd by VRK100  
 
 
BSE 500 versus Nifty 500: Same Market, Different Indices 02Jan2026 
 
Central Banks Fuel Gold Speculation: Risking Pain for Ordinary People 23Dec2025
 
Hedge Your Wealth: Protecting Your Portfolio Against Rupee Depreciation 20Dec2025
 
Tracking the Dollar Index to Understand Dollar-Rupee Moves 18Dec2025 
 
How Often Does a Falling Rupee Drag the Sensex Down? The Surprising Patterns 12Dec2025 
 
NSE's Backtesting Claims Child Indices Beat Parent Indices - But Does It Hold in Real World? 09Dec2025 
 
India's Dangerous Drift Toward Market Concentration and Corporate Power 07Dec2025
 
Does a Falling Rupee Hurt Indian Stocks? The Data Say "Not Really" 02Dec2025
 
Investing for Real People: Thumb Rules, Long-Term Thinking and Practical Wisdom 27Nov2025
 
Factor Investing in India: Do "Smart Beta" Indices Outsmart Nifty 50 and Midcap 150? 24Nov2025
 
-------------------
 
Disclosure:  I've got a vested interest in Indian stocks and other investments. It's safe to assume I've interest in the financial instruments / products discussed, if any.
 
Disclaimer: The analysis and opinion provided here are only for information purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should consult their own financial advisers before making any investments. The author is a CFA Charterholder with a vested interest in financial markets.

------------------------ 

CFA 10 Year Milestone Professional Learning Program 2025 Certificate of Achievement 



 

CFA Charter credentials  - CFA Member Profile

CFA New Badge 

CFA Badge  

 

Viewing Options for this blog in different formats:

Sidebar and so on

 

He blogs at:

https://ramakrishnavadlamudi.blogspot.com/

https://www.scribd.com/vrk100

X (Twitter) @vrk100

BSE 500 Versus Nifty 500: Same Market, Different Indices 02Jan2026

BSE 500 vs Nifty 500: Same Market, Different Indices 02Jan2026



 
 

(The views expressed here are for information purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation or investment advice. While the author is a CFA Charterholder with nearly 25 years of experience in financial markets, this content is intended to share general insights and does not constitute financial guidance. Please consult your financial adviser before taking any investment decision. Safe to assume the author has a vested interest in stocks / investments discussed if any.)




At first glance, BSE 500 and Nifty 500 look like two different ways of measuring the same thing. Different exchanges, different methodologies, different sector labels. Yet over time, their returns and risk profiles are almost indistinguishable. This post looks at why that happens.

Both the BSE 500 and Nifty 500 are "broad-market" indices, meaning they don't just track the giant blue-chip companies (like the Sensex or Nifty 50) but also include a large number of mid-sized and smaller companies.

These two broad Indian equity indices are designed to represent the overall performance of the Indian stock market. Each includes 500 listed companies across sectors and market-cap segments, covering roughly 90%+ of India’s total market capitalisation.

For more features of the indices, see the above image.

Similarities between BSE 500 and Nifty 500 Indices:

> Number of stocks are same
> Most of the stocks are same; except some stocks
> Their return and risk characteristics are similar
> The top 10 stocks in both the indices are same
> The weights of top 10 stocks are more or less same

Interestingly, the portfolio overlap (data from thefundoo.com) between the two indices is huge — about 460 stocks are common to both, accounting for 98 per cent of the portfolio weight (you can use ICICI Pru BSE 500 ETF and Motilal Oswal Nifty 500 Index Fund to compare the portfolio overlap). 

Only around 40 stocks differ, contributing a mere 2 per cent weight. This high similarity explains why both indices tend to offer almost identical returns and risk profiles. 

Top 10 stocks and their weights in Nifty 500  (same top 10 stocks in BSE 500 with similar weights) >

 

But the sector classification, prima facie, is different.

 

Spotting the Subtle Differences: Sector Weights 

Even though the two indices share most of their stocks, the way they classify and weight sectors introduces subtle differences. BSE and NSE follow slightly different rules for grouping companies into sectors, so the percentage weight of each sector can vary between the BSE 500 and the Nifty 500.

Take a look at the chart below — it highlights the sector weight differences across both indices. 

The following image shows the sector weights of BSE 500 and Nifty 500 indices as of 31Dec2025 >

 

 

The analysis reveals >

At the aggregate level, BSE 500 and Nifty 500 look extremely similar. Financials dominate both, followed by information technology (IT), consumer discretionary, energy-related sectors and consumer-facing businesses. 

The big differences are not in what the market owns, but in how sectors are grouped and labelled.

Financial services dominance:

Financial Services is the largest sector in both indices, at roughly 31 per cent weight -- reinforcing the point that Indian equity markets remain heavily bank- and NBFC-driven regardless of the index.

Sectors having same names and similar weights in both indices (see the above image):

Financial Services
Information Technology
Energy (named 'oil, gas & consumable' in Nifty 500)
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
Healthcare
Telecommunication
Utilities (named 'power' sector in Nifty 500)
Services
Diversified

Same sectors but different labelling:

Energy exposure is also very close, though NSE splits it more explicitly into “Oil, Gas & Consumables,” while BSE uses a broader “Energy” bucket.

Consumer sectors: classification is the real difference:

This is where the table looks most different at first glance. BSE 500 shows a single, large “Consumer Discretionary” block at 15 per cent. Nifty 500 breaks this same space into multiple sub-sectors—Automobiles, Consumer Services, Consumer Durables, Realty, Textiles and Media. 

When combined, these largely map to BSE’s single discretionary bucket rather than indicating a true allocation mismatch.

Industrials vs capital goods and construction:

BSE 500 reports an 8.7 per cent allocation to “Industrials.” Nifty 500 splits this into Capital Goods (5.7 per cent) and Construction (2.9 per cent). Again, the difference is more about presentation and granularity than a fundamentally different portfolio.

Commodities versus materials breakdown:

BSE 500’s “Commodities” allocation (7.9 per cent) is shown as a single sector. Nifty 500 divides this into Metals & Mining, Construction Materials and Chemicals. The combined weight is broadly comparable, but Nifty offers clearer visibility into sub-sector exposures. 

Bottom line: BSE 500 groups broadly; Nifty 500 slices finely. Once you mentally recombine Nifty’s sub-sectors, both indices tell the same story about the Indian equity market—with financials at the core and diversified growth around it.

 

Conclusion: Why They Behave Similarly and What It Means for Investors

BSE 500 groups broadly; Nifty 500 slices finely.

Despite minor differences in sector weights and classification, the BSE 500 and Nifty 500 behave almost identically when it comes to risk and returns and their economic exposure. This is because over 460 of the 500 stocks are common between them, representing 98 per cent of the total portfolio weight. 

The small differences in the remaining 40 stocks contribute very little to overall volatility or performance. For investors looking to gain broad exposure to the Indian equity market, both indices are excellent benchmarks for passive investing. 

Index funds or ETFs (exchange-traded funds) based on either index will capture nearly the same market movement, making them largely interchangeable for long-term portfolio building. 

The choice between the two can come down to fund availability, tracking error or minor sector tilts. Ultimately, these indices offer a simple, low-cost way to participate in almost the entire Indian stock market without having to pick individual stocks.


- - - 

 

----------------

Additional data:

GICS vs Indian Classification:

Globally, most index providers use standard frameworks like GICS to group companies, guiding how investors view sector exposure and diversification.

In India, BSE and NSE follow different sector classifications. Both track the same market, but their grouping and labelling of companies aren’t identical.

These differences can make BSE 500 and Nifty 500 appear more different than they are. Sector names, sizes and sub-categories vary, even though most underlying stocks overlap.

Investability:

Nifty 500 is generally considered more investable because its constituents are more liquid and easier to replicate in index funds and ETFs. This is why most passive funds and derivatives-linked products prefer Nifty 500 over BSE 500.

BSE 500 has three passive funds, whereas six passive funds currently track Nifty 500 index. 

BSE 500 has more than 4,500 listed stocks; whereas NSE has 2,900 listed stocks. 

 

Sectors and companies in Nifty 500 Index as on 31Dec2025:

'Construction materials' sector as per NSE consists of all cement companies.

'Financial serevices' sector as per NSE is: all banks, NBFCs, HFCs, insurance firms, credit rating agencies, AMCs, stock exchanges, wealth management firms, brokerage firms, capital markets infra digital, FinTech, investment / holding companies, etc.

'Diversified' sector in Nifty 500 has three companies: 3M India Ltd, DCM Shriram Ltd and Godrej Industris Ltd.

Companies in  'Consumer Services" Sector  in Nifty 500 as on 31Dec2025 as classified by NSE: (Note: Though NSE classified them as 'consumer services,' there is no Nifty index currently to directly invest in these stocks exclusively.)




Companies in  'Services' Sector in Nifty 500 as on 31Dec2025 as classified by NSE: (Note: Though NSE classified them as 'services,' there is no Nifty index currently to  invest directly in these stocks exclusively.)

 
Nifty 500 sector weights and number of stocks in each sector 31Dec2025 >

 
Nifty 500 Index    
as on 31Dec2025    
Sector Weight (%) No of stocks in Index
Financial Services        31.6 95
Information Technology          8.1 28
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels          8.0 19
Automobile and Auto Components          7.2 35
Fast Moving Consumer Goods          6.3 31
Healthcare          6.2 52
Capital Goods          5.7 64
Metals & Mining          3.9 17
Telecommunication          3.6 10
Consumer Services          3.6 26
Power          3.0 18
Construction          2.9 12
Consumer Durables          2.7 19
Construction Materials *           1.9 11
Chemicals           1.9 26
Services          1.8 14
Realty           1.1 11
Textiles           0.2 6
Media, Entertainment & Publication           0.1 4
Diversified          0.1 3
    100.0        501
* all cement stocks    
 
 
 
Funny, NSE's 'Consumer durables' sector encompasses >
 
paints 
jewellery / watches 
consumer elctronics (some EMS) 
household appliances (a few EMS) 
houseware   
footwear 
ceramics 
sanitaryware 
plywood  
plastic products 
furniture, home furnishing  

----------------

References:

Portfolio overlap tool

BSE Indices

BSE 500 factsheet

Nifty Indices

Nifty 500 factsheet 

Screenshots of BSE 500 and Nifty 500 factsheets as of 31Dec2025 >





 

----------------

Read more:

Blog of Blogs Theme-wise 
 
Weblinks and Investing
 
India Fixed Income Data Bank
 
Indian Economy Data Bank 

India Forex Data Bank 
 
Who is Eating my Gold ETF Return? (gold data / gold ETF data)
 
Corporate Groups and Listed Companies 29Dec2024
 
Corporate Governance Concerns - Indian Companies 13Dec2024
 
Stocks and Peer Comparison by Industry 16Feb2024  
 
various uploads on Scribd by VRK100  
 
 
 
Central Banks Fuel Gold Speculation: Risking Pain for Ordinary People 23Dec2025
 
Hedge Your Wealth: Protecting Your Portfolio Against Rupee Depreciation 20Dec2025
 
Tracking the Dollar Index to Understand Dollar-Rupee Moves 18Dec2025 
 
How Often Does a Falling Rupee Drag the Sensex Down? The Surprising Patterns 12Dec2025 
 
NSE's Backtesting Claims Child Indices Beat Parent Indices - But Does It Hold in Real World? 09Dec2025 
 
India's Dangerous Drift Toward Market Concentration and Corporate Power 07Dec2025
 
Does a Falling Rupee Hurt Indian Stocks? The Data Say "Not Really" 02Dec2025
 
Investing for Real People: Thumb Rules, Long-Term Thinking and Practical Wisdom 27Nov2025
 
Factor Investing in India: Do "Smart Beta" Indices Outsmart Nifty 50 and Midcap 150? 24Nov2025
 
-------------------
 
Disclosure:  I've got a vested interest in Indian stocks and other investments. It's safe to assume I've interest in the financial instruments / products discussed, if any.
 
Disclaimer: The analysis and opinion provided here are only for information purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should consult their own financial advisers before making any investments. The author is a CFA Charterholder with a vested interest in financial markets.

------------------------ 

CFA 10 Year Milestone Professional Learning Program 2025 Certificate of Achievement 



 

CFA Charter credentials  - CFA Member Profile

CFA New Badge 

CFA Badge  


Tuesday, 23 December 2025

Central Banks Fuel Gold Speculation, Risking Pain for Ordinary People 23Dec2025

Central Banks Fuel Gold Speculation, Risking Pain for Ordinary People 23Dec2025



 
 

(The views expressed here are for information purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation or investment advice. While the author is a CFA Charterholder with nearly 25 years of experience in financial markets, this content is intended to share general insights and does not constitute financial guidance. Please consult your financial adviser before taking any investment decision. Safe to assume the author has a vested interest in stocks / investments discussed if any.)

 

(Don't miss the Bonus Section and Bullish Arguments at the end of the article)

 

 

Tangible assets gold and silver have worked, for many Indian savers, as a natural hedge against gradual rupee depreciation. At least, I've analysed 25-year data to check this assertion; my analysis reinforces the theory of gold working as a natural hedge.

India’s gold prices are supported by two key forces: 

1) the gradual depreciation of the rupee over long periods, and 
2) the long-term upward trend in global gold prices, even though they may remain stagnant or volatile for years at a time. 

Together, these factors have helped gold retain purchasing power for Indian savers across economic cycles. As a result, much of gold’s return in India reflects currency protection and long-term value preservation rather than consistent year-to-year gains. 

Can we Indians depend on gold and silver as a natural hedge in future too? I am not sure. When I say future, I mean in the next five, 10 or 15 years. 

The relentless rise in world gold price (in US dollars) in the past two years is basically a central bank trade. Central banks have been loading up on gold considering it as a "safe haven" asset and a prudent reserve diversification. 

They also see gold as a hedge against geopolitical and monetary uncertainty. 

Central banks, especially, in India, China, Japan and Turkey have been adding more gold to their holdings (as part of their forex reserves) in recent years.

Counterpoint To The Current Gold Price Surge Narrative 

However, this view overlooks an important social and economic consequence: Central banks may be doing a disservice to their own populations by actively reinforcing a speculative frenzy in gold and, indirectly, in silver and other metals. 

Central Banks As Boosters Of Speculation

When central banks aggressively accumulate gold at record prices, they send a powerful signal to markets and households alike. Regardless of official intent, such actions are interpreted by the public as validation that gold prices will continue rising. 

In gold-sensitive economies, this legitimises speculative behavior among retail investors and ordinary savers. Central banks thus become catalysts of speculation rather than neutral stabilisers, even if unintentionally.

However, it's worth noting India's central bank, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) stopped adding gold to its reserves in Apr2025.

The 2025 Shift: From Aggressive Buyer to Strategic Holder:

The RBI was an aggressive buyer of gold until Mar2025. Since Apr2025, it has paused fresh purchases—possibly a strategic decision after gold crossed USD 3,000 per troy ounce. The move appears deliberate rather than coincidental.


We need to see how other Asian central banks respond to the recent surge in world gold prices. If they stop adding further, will gold price fall or go sideways or the speculators continue to take it to new highs? I don't know the answer.

Historical Lesson: Speculative Surges Hurt Ordinary People Most

History consistently shows that speculative booms—whether in equities, real estate, commodities or precious metals—do not end well for ordinary citizens. Middle-class and lower-middle-class households tend to enter late in the cycle, allocate disproportionately to the rising asset avoiding diversification. 

When the cycle turns, losses are concentrated among these groups, while large institutions and policymakers remain relatively insulated.

Manias, Panics and Crashes

The Tulip Mania in 1637 saw prices collapse 99 per cent after irrational exuberance, wiping out speculators but leaving the economy intact as it was a narrow asset frenzy. 

The dotcom bubble burst in 2000 erased trillions of dollars in tech valuations, devastating late entrants like ordinary retail investors while savvy institutions recovered faster. 

Even the 1970s commodities boom ended in a sharp reversal amid supply gluts, reminding that commodity manias punish the masses chasing peaks without fundamentals.

Gold's 1980-1983 freefall from USD 850 to nearly USD 300 echoed this, as Federal Reserve Chair Volcker's rate hikes in the US crushed speculation—yet gold later rebounded over decades, unlike one-off fads.

Gold As A Social Asset, Not Just A Financial One

In many Asian societies, gold is not merely an investment but a cultural and financial anchor for household savings. Middle- and lower-middle-class families hold gold as a perceived safe store of value, often accumulated over years or generations. 

When central banks fuel a price surge, they implicitly encourage households to commit savings at inflated prices, increasing their vulnerability to a correction.

Why Central Bank Participation Is Economically Problematic

From an overall economic viewpoint, it is problematic for central banks—institutions tasked with financial stability—to be seen adding momentum to speculative excesses. Even if gold has long-term strategic value, buying aggressively at extreme prices undermines the stabilising role central banks are meant to play. 

It blurs the line between reserve management and market distortion, especially when the social costs of a downturn are borne by citizens rather than by the institutions themselves.

Hypothetical Scenario: Gold Falls From 4500 To 2500 In Two Years

If gold prices were to fall from the current USD 4,500 to USD 2,500 per troy ounce, say, within the next two years, the nominal loss would be severe and highly visible. 

Even if the drop in gold price is caused by complex global events, for most households, the reason hardly matters — what matters is feeling poorer as the value of their gold holdings falls.

I'm not speculating it would fall or plummet from its USD-4,500-peak in the next one or two years. I'm just expressing my concerns about the social and financial impact of any such crash on common people. 

Scenario analysis: What factors could cause gold to drop from its current level of USD 4,500 per troy ounce to, say, around USD 2,500 within the next two years?

> A sustained strengthening of the US dollar, driven by higher interest rates or strong economic growth, could reduce demand for gold as a safe-haven asset.

> Central banks around the world, especially major holders like the US, European nations and China, could start aggressively selling portions of their gold reserves, increasing supply in the market

> A significant drop in geopolitical tensions, like, US-China trade tensions or Russia-Ukraine war or financial market uncertainty might weaken gold’s appeal as a hedge against risk

> Rapid adoption of alternative stores of value, such as digital assets or high-yield bonds, could divert investment away from gold

> A global economic recovery with rising real interest rates could make yield-bearing assets more attractive than non-yielding gold, pushing prices lower

> Gold returned nearly 70 per cent this year in dollar terms, and such a steep rise could temper further gains in 2026, as global investors reassess their investment plans at the start of the new year; any momentum trade has its own downside risk.

Social Impact On Common People

For common people, especially in the middle- and lower-middle classes, the impact would be immediate and psychological as well as financial. Households would feel poorer, even if losses remain unrealised. 

Negative wealth effect: Consumption would slow as families become cautious, postpone discretionary spending and rebuild savings. Gold-backed borrowing would become more constrained as collateral values fall, tightening access to liquidity for household emergencies and small businesses.

Inequality Of Outcomes

The losses from a gold correction, if any, would not be evenly distributed. Wealthier investors and institutions are typically diversified and able to absorb volatility or rotate into other assets. 

Ordinary citizens, whose savings are often concentrated in gold, would bear a disproportionate share of the pain. This reflects a familiar pattern in speculative cycles: gains are widely celebrated, but losses are concentrated and socially damaging.

Final Assessment

All speculative manias end badly, even when driven by legitimate macro concerns. By aggressively buying gold at elevated prices, central banks risk boosting a speculative cycle whose eventual unwinding will harm the very populations they are meant to protect. 

History shows that even brilliant minds are not immune to such follies: Isaac Newton, one of the greatest scientists of all time, famously lost a fortune in the South Sea Bubble, proving rational thinking often fails in the heat of a speculative mania and greed.

From a broader economic and social stability perspective, central banks should be cautious not only about what they buy, but about the signals they send—because when the cycle turns, ordinary people pay the price.


Author's personal view: I'm not a great fan of gold. You may say I've missed the rally in gold in the past two years. That's okay. 😄                                                                                                                                                                  Most of the Indians hold some gold already (34,600 tonnes as per reports)--in some cases, excess gold. In such a scenario, why hold more gold than required? Common people have their own things to do everyday, not speculate on gold prices. 

 

My angst against gold: From a common man’s view:

Gold doesn’t generate regular income
Jewellery has making charges and resale losses
Price volatility can create false comfort during rallies
Too much gold means less exposure to productive assets like equity, business or skill development

Gold exposure should ideally be limited to 5 to 8 per cent of one's total net worth, excluding essential personal jewellery that Indians customarily wear. Anything beyond this level, in my opinion, constitutes excess allocation and does little to improve long-term financial outcomes.

Final word from the Oracle of Omaha: Warren Buffett famously remarked that gold has no real utility, as it does not generate income, produce goods or contribute to productive economic activity — a reminder that while gold may shine, it does not work for you the way productive assets do.


- - - 

 

Bonus Section

There are some investment investment options accessible to middle-class and upper-middle-class Indian investors that can help protect against a combination of rupee depreciation and persistent inflation, which are the hallmarks of Indian economy. 

Here they are (not necessarily in this order):

Equity mutual funds in India offer broad market exposure and have historically outpaced inflation, helping savers preserve purchasing power despite rupee depreciation (caveat: active equity funds have their own set of issues).

National Pension Scheme or NPS with a majority equity portion allows salaried and self-employed investors to build long-term retirement wealth that can grow faster than inflation while benefiting from tax incentives.

Direct stocks, for savvy investors, provide the potential for high returns and dividends that can help protect the harmful effects of persistent inflation and currency weakening.

Gold has traditionally served as a hedge against rupee depreciation and inflation, though its future effectiveness may be uncertain with gold prices at historic levels.

Real estate, depending on location, with reasonable rental yields allows owners to adjust rents with inflation, offering both income and capital appreciation as a hedge against currency and price pressures.

Mutual funds in India with exposure to foreign stocks provide diversification and potential protection against domestic currency depreciation. 

Direct global stocks give investors (restricted) access to economies outside India, helping shield wealth from rupee depreciation and inflation in the local market.

Listed REITs or real estate investment trusts offer exposure to real estate income streams without large capital outlay, helping protect against inflation while remaining liquid. But the REITs asset class in India lacks options for potential investors. 

Direct foreign stocks or foreign equity ETFs or exchange trade funds allow investors to hedge against domestic currency loss and benefit from growth in stronger or stable foreign economies.

Key takeaway for middle-class investors:

A diversified mix—some domestic equity exposure (direct or via mutual funds), NPS  and a small allocation to REITs or foreign assets—offers a reasonable hedge against both persistent inflation and rupee depreciation without taking excessive risk. Happy Investing!😁

 

P.S.: Bullish arguments for gold by experts (including those with vested interests): 

Central Bank Demand: Banks like China and India continue stockpiling gold as reserves, with recent surges acting as "boosters" that stabilise and lift prices amid fiat currency concerns.

​Inflation Hedge: Persistent inflation and loose monetary policies make gold a premier store of value, drawing retail and institutional buyers during economic volatility.

​Geopolitical Tensions: Ongoing conflicts, the US-China trade frictions, Russia-Ukraine war and China sabre rattling in the South Pacific Ocean boost safe haven demand, historically pushing gold 20 to 30 per cent higher in such periods.

Technical Momentum: Gold's 50-day and 200-day moving averages trend upward (around USD 4,150 and USD 3,560 respectively), with year lows at USD 2,600 signaling room for new highs toward USD 5,000.

​Supply Constraints: Mining output lags demand growth, with limited new discoveries ensuring scarcity-driven price support over 2026-2027.