Showing posts with label Iridium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iridium. Show all posts

Saturday, 13 September 2025

Why We Forget Failed Tech — and Only Celebrate the Winners? 13Sep2025

Why We Forget Failed Tech — and Only Celebrate the Winners? 13Sep2025



 
 
 

 
"By the time today’s babies graduate from college, the treatments for most diseases will have been revolutionized by this project.

~ Francis Collins, director of Human Genome Project or HGP (1999)
 
 
 
 
In 2000, President Bill Clinton, alongside UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, announced the completion of the Human Genome Project with lot of pomp and celebration.

Clinton described it as a historic milestone, calling it a moment where “we are learning the language in which God created life.” He emphasised the profound potential of genetic science to revolutionise how we prevent, diagnose and treat disease.
 
The Human Genome Project was hailed as the dawn of a new era in medicine. Yet, two decades later, its promises have been only partially realised.

People tend to remember and celebrate the success stories, while forgetting or ignoring the many failed attempts that once had just as much (or more) hype.
 
We celebrate the internet in the 1990s, but forget the hundreds of ventures that failed spectacularly in the 1990s and early 2000s. We glorify the success of AWS (launched in 2006) in cloud computing but can't recall the early failures, like Cisco Intercloud and Sun Microsystems' "The Internet is the Computer."
 

Survivorship Bias 
 
This is survivorship bias at work: we focus on the winners, ignoring the many failures that were once just as hyped, visionary and well-funded. In technology, we tend to assume progress is inevitable. 

Survivorship bias is the tendency to concentrate on people, ideas, stocks or things that made it past a selection process — while ignoring those that didn’t.
 
For every Nvidia or Amazon that made investors rich, there are dozens of hyped-up companies that burned out, faded away or never delivered. 
 
For every breakout success in technology, there are dozens of ambitious ideas that never made it.
 
In tech, it means we focus on success stories like Google, iPhone or Tesla, and forget all the Theranoses, Zunes and Segways that never made it.
 
 
Story continues below 

----------------------
 
Read more:
 
Loss of First-mover Advantage 
 
----------------------

 
Disappointing breakthroughs
 
History is full of examples of technologies that were announced with great fanfare and predicted to revolutionise the world, but ultimately fell short of expectations or failed to achieve widespread adoption. 

The reasons for these failures are varied, often a combination of technological limitations, market miscalculations, high costs or a lack of public acceptance.

Here are some technologies that once carried massive hype — some even labeled as world-changing — but ultimately failed, stalled, or quietly disappeared. Not because they weren’t clever, but because hype isn’t the same as lasting impact.
 
Each of these failures reminds us that success in tech isn’t just about innovation — it’s about timing, usability, execution, trust and sometimes, plain luck. When we only study the successes, we risk learning the wrong lessons.

For entrepreneurs: “Study failures just as hard as successes — the graveyard of tech is full of good ideas poorly timed.”

For investors: “Don’t confuse a strong demo with a sustainable business model.”

For general readers: “Just because something is trending doesn’t mean it will last.”
 
The next time you hear that a new technology is going to change the world, pause and ask: Is this another iPhone — or another Google Glass? The difference is easy to see in hindsight. But survivorship bias means we rarely see the failures when we're caught up in the mania.
 
Iridium is a classic and fascinating case of a technological marvel that failed commercially at first, despite being hyped as revolutionary.

Google Loon is another example of a heavily hyped technology that ultimately failed to deliver on its promises. Project Loon aimed to provide global internet access using high-altitude balloons floating in the stratosphere.

Due to technical complications, high costs and commercial non-viability, Loon was shut down by Alphabet Inc (parent of Google) in 2021. Elon Musk's Starlink emerged as a viable alternative with the concept of low-earth orbit satellites.  
 
There are many more such instances of technologies that have failed to live up to expectations.  

List of Overhyped or Failed Technologies: Iridium, Hyperloop, Google Loon, Facebook Aquila, Human Genome Project, Theranos, Segway, Microsoft Zune, Flying cars, Google Glass, 23andMe and Blockchain.


 
 
Work in Progress
 
Unlike failed tech, some ideas - like 3D printing and the Metaverse - survive in a grey area: overhyped at first, but still evolving quietly in the background, away from the headlines.

Failure isn’t the end — in fact, it’s often part of the innovation cycle. Many of the technologies we label as failures today planted seeds that helped future breakthroughs succeed.
 
A failed technology isn't always a waste — it can be a prototype for the next wave, a cautionary tale or even the launchpad for something better.

Iridium (Satellite Phones): Failed commercially at launch, went bankrupt in 1999.

But the satellite network was later revived by the US Department of Defense and other industries needing remote communications.

Today, Iridium operates a global satellite network with real users — including emergency services, aviation and military.
 
Legacy: Proved viability of LEO (low Earth orbit) satellite constellations — a concept now driving Starlink.
 
Innovation isn’t just about celebrating the survivors — it’s about learning from the fallen. Some failures fade quietly. Others become the launching pads for the future.
 
 
The Future of ChatGPT?
 
The future of ChatGPT remains uncertain, even though it has triggered an AI boom in under three years. The AI boom is a rapid surge in development, investment and adoption of artificial intelligence technologies across industries, changing how we work, live and interact.
 
Aswath Damodaran, NYU Stern School of Business professor wrote a year ago: "AI's net positive effect on markets overall will be surprisingly small. The reason is that there will be only a few big winners, but many wannabes, losers, and market chasers who are forced to invest in the new technology merely to keep up." 

As Damodaran notes, the hype around revolutionary technologies tends to produce a handful of big winners, while the rest are followers, chasers or failures. From internet, online commerce to smartphones to AI today, we've seen the survivorship bias movie play out consistently.

It’s easy to see why experts like Damodaran remain sceptical — history shows that most technological revolutions benefit a few dominant players, while the rest struggle to survive.

- - -
 
 
 
------------------------ 
 
References:
 
Above image: Google Gemini 
 
 
Human Genome Project completion by Bill Clinton and Tony Blair 
 
The Innovator's Dilemma by Clayton Christensen 
 
 
Other examples of failed or overhyped technologies : 3D television, hoverboards, Facebook Libra cryptocurrency, AOL, New Coke, BlackBerry, Microsoft Bing, Napster, Apple Newton MessagePad, Tata Nano, Amazon Fire Phone, Netscape Navigator, Palm Pilot, Apple iTunes and others.


 

Sunday, 16 March 2025

Loss of First-mover Advantage

 

Loss of First-mover Advantage 16Mar2025
 

 

 
(This is for information purposes only. This should not be construed as a recommendation or investment advice even though the author is a CFA Charterholder. Please consult your financial adviser before taking any investment decision. Safe to assume the author has a vested interest in stocks / investments discussed if any.)
 
  

 
There are no guarantees in markets and the corporate world. Only a handful of companies can withstand the onslaught of technology disruption. There are several instances where companies have lost their first-mover advantage:

Adam Osborne invented the first laptop computer, but failed ultimately to exploit it.

AltaVista search engine (launched by DEC in 1995) and Yahoo had lost ground to Google search engine in the end.

MySpace lost to Facebook in social media. 
 
Most of you are familiar with how eBay lost to Amazon Inc in the e-commerce space.  eBay could not withstand the Amazon's aggressive expansion. While eBay focused on sellers, Amazon did a paradigm shift with focus on ultimate buyers.
 
Last-mover advantage
 
In his 2014 book 'Zero to One: Notes on startups, or how to build the future,' Peter Thiel wrote: "Microsoft in 2002 and Nokia in 2006 released their tablets -- but they failed to click in the market because they were hard to use. But Apple released its iPad in 2010, with huge improvements in design and ease, and it became a big success. Apple enjoyed benefits as a last mover."

Though started with a first-mover advantage in web browsers, Netscape Navigator (started in 1994) lost its dominance to Microsoft's Internet Explorer or IE. IE was bundled with Windows software resulting in the demise of Netscape Navigator (Microsoft's Internet Explorer, now Edge, itself losing later to Google Chrome, Apple Safari and Mozilla Firefox browsers is a different issue).

In the 1970s, Xerox PARC pioneered groundbreaking technologies, like, graphical user interface (GUI) but failed to commercialise them. Ultimately, Apple's Macintosh computers and Microsoft's Windows reaped the benefits of Xerox's GUI technology.
 
If you want to know more about Xerox PARC's GUI technology, you need to read a book titled 'Steve Jobs,' in which Walter Isaacson vividly describes Jobs' efforts to use GUI, while Xerox looked the other way.
 
Japan's Nintendo was an undisputed leader in the video game console market in the 1980s and early 1990s. But with the entry of Sony's PlayStation in 1994, it lost its dominance. PlayStation and Microsoft's Xbox are now the leaders.
 
Even though Kodak introduced the first digital camera in 1975, it failed to capitalise on its first-mover advantage by ceding ground to rivals Nikon and Canon first and to smartphones later. Kodak filed for bankruptcy in 2012.

Though a first-mover, Dunzo lost to Blinkit and Zepto in India's fast-chain 10-minute grocery delivery.

Nissan Leaf, launched in 2010, was a pioneer in mass-market electric cars. But in the next five to 10 years, it had lost its first-mover advantage due to competition from Tesla and Chinese carmakers like BYD and others.

Nokia was a leader in mobile phones in the 1990s and early 2000s. It failed to adapt itself to smartphone revolution, resulting in loss of its first-mover advantage to Apple's iPhones and Samsung Android phones. Nokia's Symbian OS failed to upgrade to smartphone technology.

Launched in 1999, BlackBerry was a gamechanger -- it combined emails and wireless communication. BlackBerry was earlier known as Research in Motion or RIM. By late 2000s, it lost its first-mover advantage to Apple's iPhone and other smartphones.

Will DeepSeek dethrone the first-mover OpenAI's ChatGPT? Though China's DeepSeek has its cost advantages right now, any serious challenge to ChatGPT's current dominance in artificial intelligence / artificial general intelligence is some time away in my humble opinion. 


 
- - -
 
 
-------------------
 
References: 
 
Peter Thiel: "Zero to One: Notes on startups, or how to build the future
 
Walter Isaacson: "Steve Jobs: The Exclusive Biography" 

Notes:
 
Netscape Navigator was earlier known as Mosaic Netscape. 

-------------------
 
Afterthought on 17Mar2025:
 
Iridium / Google Loon / Facebook Aquila / Starlink

Iridium was conceived as a revolutionary idea in global mobile communication. Due to several reasons, the technology failed to catch up, though Iridium still operates satellite phones in remote areas. But ultimately, other technologies like GSM and CDMA have dominated the mobile communication.

Now, SpaceX’s Starlink is dominating the world in satellite internet. It has more than 7,000 satellites (in low earth orbit) around the globe. (There are other competitors to Starlink, like, OneWeb and Kuiper Systems).

On the other hand, Iridium has 66 working satellites now.

The use cases of Iridium satellite communication and SpaceX’s Starlink satellite communication are slightly different. Iridium satellite phones are more rugged and easy to call any phone in the world. Iridium is primarily used for voice calls and low-data services. Starlink provides high-speed internet.

In the early 2010s, Google started Project Loon to provide internet in remote and rural areas, by using high-altitude balloons. But the project failed, with Google shutting it down in 2021.

Facebook too started its own internet service called Aquila, using solar-powered drones. It ultimately disbanded the project in 2018, due mainly to technological failures.
 
 
-------------------
 
Read more:
 
Blog of Blogs Theme-wise 
 
Weblinks and Investing
 
India Fixed Income Data Bank
 
Indian Economy Data Bank 

India Forex Data Bank 
 
 
India's Most-Profitable Sectors: Where Big Earnings Are Made 10Mar2025
 
JP Morgan Guide to Markets 28Feb2025
 
NSE Indices Comparison 31Dec2024
 
JP Morgan Guide to Markets 31Dec2024
 
Corporate Groups and Listed Companies 29Dec2024
 
Corporate Governance Concerns - Indian Companies 13Dec2024
 
Opinion on Maharashtra Seamless 15Nov2024
 
Wars and Wealth Protection
 
Mutual Fund Asset Class Returns 30Sep2024
 
Primer on Global Capability Centres - India is World's GCC Capital 
 

-------------------

Disclosure:  I've got a vested interest in Indian stocks and other investments. It's safe to assume I've interest in the financial instruments / products discussed, if any.

Disclaimer: The analysis and opinion provided here are only for information purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should consult their own financial advisers before making any investments. The author is a CFA Charterholder with a vested interest in financial markets.

------------------------

CFA Charter credentials  - CFA Member Profile

CFA New Badge 

CFA Badge