Showing posts with label Indian stocks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Indian stocks. Show all posts

Sunday, 21 May 2023

Listed Companies with Zero Promoter Holding Mar2023 - vrk100 - 21May2023

Listed Companies with Zero Promoter Holding Mar2023

 

(This is for information purposes only. This should not be construed as a recommendation or investment advice even though the author is a CFA Charterholder. Please consult your financial adviser before taking any investment decision. Safe to assume the author has a vested interest in stocks / investments discussed if any.)  

 

(This is an update of an earlier blog dated 04Dec2022)

 

On average, a little more than 50 percent of the equity shareholding in Indian listed stocks is held by promoters. However, only a handful of listed companies, out of more than 4,000 listed companies, in India have zero promoter holding. 


The following list provides a glimpse of such companies in the order of their market capitalisation (companies with a zero promoter holding as on 31Mar2023 and a market cap of more than Rs 1,500 crore as on 19May2023) > 

 


Compared to the previous data as of 30Sep2022, six companies, namely, Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals, Equitas Small Finance Bank, Indiabulls Housing Finance, Hindustan Oil Exploration, Balmer Lawrie & Co and Subex Ltd., are added to the list of zero promoter holding between Sep2022 and Mar2023.  

 

Private equity firms Advent International and Temasek Holdings have completely exited Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals, after buying the firm in 2016. Hence, the promoter stake is marked down to zero as on 31Dec2022.

 

As part of a Scheme of Amalgamation, Equitas Holdings Ltd was merged with Equitas Small Finance Bank effective 02Feb2023. Hence, Equitas SFB now has no promoter stake officially. 


At the top of the list by market cap are companies, like, ICICI Bank, ITC, HDFC Limited (which is in the process of getting merged with HDFC Bank Ltd), L&T and new-age company Zomato. At the other end are companies, like, Balmer Lawerie & Co, Cartrade Tech and Care Ratings. 


You may have noticed that private banks and other financial services companies dominate the above list. Other stocks include stock / energy exchanges, platform companies and those relating to new-age companies listed in the past one year or so. 

 

India's banking regulator, Reserve Bank of India or RBI, is not comfortable with promoters running the show in a bank (the fear is a bank promoter may misuse bank funds for lending to other promoter entities and ultimately troubling the bank).

 

Only a handful of private sector banks, like, Kotak Mahindra Bank, IndusInd Bank, AU Small Finance Bank, IDFC First Bank and Bandhan Bank have promoter stake of between 16 and 40 percent.

 

LIC of India has 8.2 percent stake in Axis Bank and is considered as a promoter for technical reasons. Practically, Axis Bank is run professionally similar to ICICI bank.


Technically, some firms may have zero promoter holding -- but, a set of people may hold firm control over the company practically. 


It is often argued firms with managements having high promoter stake (that is, with substantial skin in the game or family-owned businesses) will do better than firms that are run by managements with no significant shareholding. 

 

It's generally believed that a high promoter holding gives strong incentives for the owners / managers to create and sustainably generate long term value for minority shareholders. 

 

Professional managers might be tempted to work for themselves and in the process their actions may be detrimental to the long-term interests of the owners (which is known as principal-agent problem in corporate lexicon). 

 

There are certain companies with large promoter holding, but which are run by professional managers -- for example, Asian Paints, Marico Ltd, HCL Technologies, Pidilite Industries and others. In general, the promoters of these companies do not interfere in the day-to-day operations of the company. Such companies are in a completely different league.

 

Let us see, on a three- to five-year perspective, how the firms with no promoter holding will stack up against companies managed by promoters / owners.


- - -

----------------

 
Read more:
 
Buyback Offers and Weblinks
 
Negative Cash Conversion Cycle and Negative Working Capital
 
Aspects of Shadow Banking System
 
Understanding Floating Rate Savings Bonds 2020 (Taxable)
 
Ipca Labs to Acquire Unichem Labs
 
Wipro Ltd Buyback Offer 2023
 
Short Notes on Bandhan Bank
 
JP Morgan Guide to Markets Mar2023
 
The Scourge of Negative Real Interest Rates Continues
 
BSE 500 vs S&P 500 Indices Compare 31Mar2023 
 
Nifty 50 Index Quarterly Movement 31Mar2023
 
Negative Impact of Debt Mutual Fund Tax Changes

Why Do Indian Equity Mutual Funds Always Disappoint Investors?
 
Weblinks and Investing

-------------------

 

Disclosure:  I've vested interested in Indian stocks and other investments. It's safe to assume I've interest in the financial instruments / products discussed, if any.

Disclaimer: The analysis and opinion provided here are only for information purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should consult their own financial advisers before making any investments. The author is a CFA Charterholder with a vested interest in financial markets. 

CFA Charter credentials  - CFA Member Profile

CFA Badge

 

He blogs at:

https://ramakrishnavadlamudi.blogspot.com/

https://www.scribd.com/vrk100

Twitter @vrk100  

Sunday, 4 December 2022

Listed Companies with Zero Promoter Holding Sep2022 - vrk100 - 04Dec2022

Listed Companies with Zero Promoter Holding Sep2022

 

 

(An update dated 21May2023 on this topic is available) 

 

On average, a little more than 50 percent of the equity shareholding in Indian listed stocks is held by promoters. However, only a handful of listed companies, out of more than 4,000 listed companies, in India have zero promoter holding. 


The following list provides a glimpse of such companies in the order of their market capitalisation > 

 

At the top of the list by market cap are companies, like, ICICI Bank, HDFC Limited (which is in the process of getting merged with HDFC Bank Ltd), ITC, L&T and new-age company Zomato. At the other end are companies, like, Equitas Holding, Cartrade Tech and Care Ratings. 


You may have noticed that private banks and other financial services companies dominate the above list. Other stocks include stock / energy exchanges, platform companies and those relating to new-age companies listed in the past one year or so.

 

Technically, some firms may have zero promoter holding -- but, a set of people may hold firm control over the company practically. 


It is often argued firms with managements having high promoter stake (that is, with substantial skin in the game or family-owned businesses) will do better than firms that are run by managements with no significant shareholding. 

 

It's generally believed that a high promoter holding gives strong incentives for the owners / managers to create and sustainably generate long term value for minority shareholders. 

 

Professional managers might be tempted to work for themselves and in the process their actions may be detrimental to the long-term interests of the owners (which is known as principal-agent problem in corporate lexicon).  

 

Let us see, on a three- to five-year perspective, how the firms with no promoter holding will stack up against companies managed by promoters / owners.

 

- - -

P.S. 2 dated 21May2023:  Equitas Holdings Ltd was wrongly included in the list of zero promoter holding. In fact, the company as on 30Sep2022, had a promoter 26.14 percent.

P.S. 1:  There are certain companies with large promoter holding, but which are run by professional managers -- for example, Asian Paints, Marico Ltd, HCL Technologies, Pidilite Industries and others. In general, the promoters of these companies do not interfere in the day-to-day operations of the company. Such companies are in a completely different league.

-------------------

Read more:  

Indian Energy Exchange Buyback Offer 2022 

Larsen & Toubro Infotech & Mindtree Merger Effective 14Nov2022

Indian Energy Exchange Limited - Brief Analysis

JP Morgan Guide to the Markets 

Infosys Limited Buyback Offer 2022

Global Market Data 30Sep2022

JP Morgan Guide to the Markets

Indians' Love For Cash Continues Unabated

Exit India Policy by Foreign Investors

Nifty 50 Index Quarterly Movement

Mutual Fund Asset Class Returns

Global Bond Yields and Asset Prices

Slowest Growth in India's Real Per Capita Income

Weblinks and Investing

-------------------

 

Disclosure:  I've vested interested in Indian stocks and other investments. It's safe to assume I've interest in the financial instruments / products discussed, if any.

Disclaimer: The analysis and opinion provided here are only for information purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should consult their own financial advisers before making any investments. The author is a CFA Charterholder with a vested interest in financial markets. 

CFA Charter credentials  - CFA Member Profile

CFA Badge

 

He blogs at:

https://ramakrishnavadlamudi.blogspot.com/

https://www.scribd.com/vrk100

Twitter @vrk100

Friday, 21 January 2022

Foreign Investors' Waning Interest in Indian Stocks - vrk100 - 21Jan2022

Foreign Investors' Waning Interest in Indian Stocks

 

 

Ever since the US Federal Reserve hinted at tapering of its bond buying programme (popularly known as quantitative easing or QE) in mid-September 2021, foreign investors started turning negative on Indian stocks. Between September and December 2021, their outflows (Table 1 below) from Indian stocks amounted to a little more than Rs 25,000 crore.

Foreign investors in India are officially known as FPIs or foreign portfolio investors. 

Even in the first three weeks of 2022, the stock outflows of FPIs amounted to nearly Rs 12,000 crore. Of course, global stocks have seen increased downside volatility in the past one or two months exacerbated by runaway inflationary expectations and fears of Federal Reserve, the US central bank, raising its benchmark interest rates.

Amidst the outbreak of COVID-19 Pandemic in March 2020, FPIs withdrew Rs 62,000 crore from Indian stocks, with Sensex and Nifty 50 indices falling by 23 per cent in the month of March 2020 (the actual drawdown for Sensex between 20Feb2020 and 23Mar2020 was 38 per cent).

This is the typical behaviour of FPIs during the global crises. They tend to take their money back towards their home country (flight to safety).  Though their influence on Indian stock market has waned in the past five to six years thanks to increased participation by domestic institutional investors and growing financialisation of savings in India.

 

-------------------

Read more: 

Participatory Notes or P Notes

FPI Flows into Indian Stock Market

Indian Equity ETF Risks and Returns

RBI Issues New 10-year G-Sec Paper

BSE Broad and Sector Indices Returns 31Dec2021

Modi Rally, Recency Bias and Stock Market Returns

Indian Mutual Funds and The Art of Ripping Off Investors  

Do Paint Stocks and Crude Oil Tango?

Weblinks and Investing

-------------------

 

Table 1: FPI Flows into Indian Stocks in 2021 (click image to view better) > 


The FPIs were first allowed to participate in Indian stock market in 1991. Several years back, FPIs (earlier known as foreign institutional investors or FIIs) used to own almost a fourth of Indian listed stocks.

In recent years their share has fallen to one-fifth of the total. Last year, FPIs' share has further fallen below 20 per cent.

Table 2: FPI AUC data - Assets Under Custody (click image to view better)

 

The figure of Rs 48.57 lakh crore or USD 654 billion (Table 2 above) represents the current value (as on 31Dec2021) of equity investments made cumulatively by FPIs since they were allowed to invest in Indian stocks in 1991. 

FPIs hold 18 per cent of listed stocks as at the end of 2021. They used to hold 20 per cent as at the end of 2020. This is as per the data compiled by NSDL or National Securities Depository Ltd. 

The value of FPI equity holding increased by 28.5 per cent in rupee terms and 26.4 per cent in dollar terms during the calendar year 2021--helped mainly by the solid 24 per cent return attained by Nifty 50 index in 2021. 

Indian government's openness toward stock market flows enabled FPIs to accumulate a large part of listed space over the past three decades. This has helped in broadening the financial markets in India.

FPI flows are typically influenced by the currency expectations (Indian rupee versus US dollar) of FPIs, valuation attractiveness of Indian stocks versus their global peers, and the volatility of the US stock market (represented by CBOE VIX). 

FPIs typically tend to invest in large-cap stocks with high free float (which is the number of shares available for trading after the share of promoters), high liquidity and broader shareholding. Their share is high in bluechip stocks, banking and technology stocks in India.

Promoters' share in Indian listed firms is roughly north of 50 per cent of the total number of equity shares.

Though the FPIs' share in Indian listed stocks has come down substantially in recent years, they continue to exert their influence on Indian equity market.

With the FPIs turning negative, it will be interesting to see whether the domestic institutional and retail investors will be able to absorb the selling (if continued further in 2022) from foreign investors. Let us wait and watch!


 

- - -

 

P.S.: (cross check of data) The figure of Rs 52,72,593 crore mentioned as FPI AUC in Table 2 tallies with figure mentioned in page 21 of SEBI Bulletin Jan2022 - 


Past data:

My Tweet 23Apr2021 - data as of 31Mar2021



References:

My Tweet 03May2018  - FPI investment limits in G-Secs, SDLs and corporate bonds >



Abbreviations used:

FPIs - foreign portfolio investors (foreign investors investing through Indian stock and debt markets)

 

Disclosure:  I've vested interested in Indian stocks and other investments. It's safe to assume I've interest in the financial instruments / products discussed, if any.

Disclaimer: The analysis and opinion provided here are only for information purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should consult their own financial advisers before making any investments. The author is a CFA Charterholder with a vested interest in financial markets. 

CFA Charter credentials  - CFA Member Profile

CFA Badge

 

He blogs at:

https://ramakrishnavadlamudi.blogspot.com/

https://www.scribd.com/vrk100

Twitter @vrk100

 

Sunday, 2 January 2022

Modi Rally, Recency Bias and Indian Stock Market Returns - vrk100 - 02Jan2022

Modi Rally, Recency Bias and Indian Stock Market Returns 


 

One could argue that the so-called 'Modi Rally' in Indian stock market started in December of 2013. It may be recalled that the then Gujarat state chief minister Narendra Modi was elected as Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) prime ministerial candidate in September of 2013.

Perceiving him to be 'business-friendly,' the Indian stock market started rallying in the last quarter of 2013, that is, between October and December of 2013. Prior to December 2013, Indian stocks remained subdued for a long period. 

Many investors and traders have this notion that Indian stock market has been doing well during prime minister Modi regime that started in May of 2014. Many retail investors (including small and high-net-worth individuals) are of the opinion that the so-called Modi Rally is beneficial for stock market.

-------------------

Read more: 

Mutual fund asset class returns

GE Shipping Company buyback offer

Saver's curse: Low Savings Rates and Liquid Mutual Fund Returns

Indian Mutual Funds and The Art of Ripping Off Investors Do Paint Stocks and Crude Oil Tango?

BSE Broad and Sectoral Indices Returns

Weblinks and Investing

-------------------

 

This feeling is especially pronounced since the middle of 2020 and  continues even now as Indian investors are biased by the recent returns they enjoyed, particularly taking higher exposure to small-, mid- and tiny-cap stocks--which entail higher risks as compared to large-cap and quality stocks. 

In psychology, this is referred to as recency bias. Our minds perceive things more favourably with recent events. As investors and traders have enjoyed decent to spectacular returns for almost two years in the recent past, they continue to consider PM Modi to  be  good for Indian stocks.

But when we look at the data, we get a different impression from the favourable notion they have of the Modi Rally. For the record, the benchmark Sensex index generated a CAGR (compounded annual growth rate) or annualised return of just 13.5 per cent in the past eight years since the start of Modi Rally in December 2013 and till now, that is, till the end of December 2021.

Nifty 50 index too delivered the same CAGR of  13.5 per cent in the same period, while the BSE 200 index delivered a slightly higher return of 14.6 per cent. If you adjust these returns down with the actual inflation (which is between eight and 10 per cent per year--as you know, the official data are manipulated) suffered by people, the returns are not good.

Table: Calendar Year Returns of BSE Sensex, Nifty 50 and BSE 200 indices - 2014 to 2021 - CAGR returns for various periods


On a three- and five-year basis, the returns look decent as they include the superior returns of 2020 and 2021. If you look at the calendar year returns, you may have observed that investors had suffered for four years in 2015, 2016, 2018 and 2019 with below-average returns.

The returns provided here are price returns (not total returns that include dividends). You can adjust the above figures with a dividend yield of between 1 and 1.5 per cent for the dividends. At the index level, Indian investors don't get much dividend yields these years. 

Undoubtedly, some mid-cap and small-cap stocks have done exceedingly well in the past eight years between 2014 and 2021--especially in 2014, 2017, 2020 and 2021. You may check my article 'BSE Broad and Sectoral Indices Returns' with the latest information updated as of 31Dec2021.

It is always a good idea to check our perceptions and notions with the reality of unbiased data and opinion. 

- - -


Disclosure:  I've vested interested in Indian stocks and other investments. It's safe to assume I've interest in the financial instruments / products discussed, if any.

Disclaimer: The analysis and opinion provided here are only for information purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should consult their own financial advisers before making any investments. The author is a CFA Charterholder with a vested interest in financial markets. 

CFA Charter credentials  - CFA Member Profile

CFA Badge

 

He blogs at:

https://ramakrishnavadlamudi.blogspot.com/

https://www.scribd.com/vrk100

Twitter @vrk100

Wednesday, 1 January 2014

Outlook for Indian Stocks in 2014-VRK100-31Dec2013





During the calendar year 2013, the S&P BSE Sensex 30 index clocked a return of 9 percent, while the NSE’s Nifty 50 index rose by 6.8 percent. But the BSE Dollex 30 index recorded a negative return of 3.5 percent due to steep depreciation, around 12 percent, of Indian rupee against the US dollar. Dollex 30 is dollar-linked version of Sensex. Let us see which sectors have come out winners and losers and what is in store for Indian stocks in 2014.

Sectoral performance:

Among the sectors that have done well are BSE IT index and Healthcare indices, with a gain of 60 and 23 percent respectively. Significantly, both these sectors have partly benefited from the rupee fall. Other things that benefited these sectors are strong export growth, investors’ bias towards companies with strong balance sheets and better corporate governance, good potential for growth and slight recovery in the US economy. Other sectors that have done well include FMCG and Automotive sectors.

Real estate and public sector companies continue to be among the worst-performing sectors in 2013. The BSE Realty and PSU indices showed a negative growth of 32 and 19 percent respectively.

Returns and Volatility:

The Sensex return of 9 percent in 2013 does not reflect the volatility of stock markets in 2013. The benchmark index started the year with 19,510 and reached a peak of 20,328 (intra-day) on 17May2013. But due to fears of Fed tapering, steep fall of rupee against dollar, high current account deficit and policy-related paralysis in India; the index fell to an intra-day low of 17,922 on 27Aug2013.

After the US Federal Reserve deferring the proposed tapering, Raghuram Rajan taking over the reins of Reserve Bank of India and return of FII portfolio inflows; the Indian stock markets recovered sharply with the Sensex reaching an intra-day high of 21,484 on 09Dec2013. By the end of December 2013, the index closed at 21,171. Between May and August 2013, the Sensex fell by 12 percent.

But between September and December 2013, the benchmark index rose by 18 percent, giving some cheer to scary and wary investors. During 2013, the FIIs have brought in USD 20 billion to Indian equity markets.

Why the Difference between Sensex and Nifty Returns?

While Sensex recorded a gain of 9 percent, the Nifty rose by 6.8 percent only. The difference is due to the fact that Sensex consists of 30 companies, while the Nifty reflects prices of 50 blue chip companies. Moreover, at the start of 2013, Nifty was concentrated toward banks and financial companies. During July and August 2013, banking sector lost heavily—though banking stocks recovered in the last four months.  For 2013, the BSE Bankex lost 9.4 percent—causing the difference between Sensex and Nifty returns.

BSE Market Capitalization:

Total Market Capitalisation of All BSE companies:

Rs Crore
USD Billion
USD-INR
Dec.2007
71 69 985
 1 818
39.41
Dec.2010
72 96 726
 1 616
44.44
Dec.2013
70 44 258
 1 125
61.80
Note: Figures are end of the month; USD-INR is US dollar-Indian rupee exchange rate


Some interesting facts come out when you look at the above table. The market cap of all BSE companies at the end of December 2007 was Rs 71.70 lakh crore, converted to USD 1,818 billlion. But the market cap slumped to USD 1,125 billion (a fall of 38 percent) by the end of December 2013, though in rupee terms it fell by only 2 percent.

Two factors contributed to the steep fall in market cap, in dollar terms, of all BSE companies. One is the steep depreciation of rupee against the dollar. Another factor is the fact that broader indices themselves have fallen. For example, BSE 200 index lost 4.7 percent between December 2007 and December 2013.

Performance Chart for 2013:

Indices
31-Dec-13
31-Dec-12
% change




BSE Sensex
 21 171
 19 427
9.0
BSE DOLLEX 30
 2 816
 2 917
(3.5)
BSE 200
 2 531
 2 424
4.4
BSE Mid Cap
 6 706
 7 113
(5.7)
BSE Small Cap
 6 551
 7 380
(11.2)




BSE Auto
 12 259
 11 426
7.3
BSE Bankex
 13 002
 14 345
(9.4)
BSE Capital Goods
 10 264
 10 868
(5.6)
BSE Consumer Durables
 5 821
 7 719
(24.6)
BSE FMCG
 6 567
 5 916
11.0
BSE Healthcare
 9 966
 8 132
22.6
BSE IT
 9 082
 5 684
59.8
BSE Metal
 9 964
 11 070
(10.0)
BSE Oil & Gas
 8 834
 8 519
3.7
BSE Power
 1 701
 1 991
(14.6)
BSE PSU
 5 910
 7 335
(19.4)
BSE Realty
 1 433
 2 111
(32.1)
BSE TECK
 5 051
 3 428
47.4




Nifty 50
 6 304
 5 905
6.8


As can be seen from the above table, the performance of Sensex, BSE Mid Cap and Small Cap indices differs widely—though select mid cap and small cap companies delivered good to decent returns in the latter half of 2013.

It is interesting to note that mid cap and small cap stocks did better than Sensex in 2012. Investors mood changes—some years they’re optimistic about large caps and in some years they shift their bias towards mid and small cap companies. In general, it’s difficult to predict the mood swings of investors.



What to Expect in 2014?

However, my sense is that small cap and mid cap companies may do well in 2014, subject to the caveat that 2014 general election will throw up a stable government and the Indian economy will fare well next year. Having said that, I would like to add that investors are required to be more diligent as far as small cap and mid cap companies are concerned. They’ve to be very careful about choosing their stock picks. If they’re not experienced, they better consult their financial advisors before investing.

World markets, particularly the US and Japanese, have done extremely well with S&P 500 rising by close to 30 percent and Nikkei 225 by 57 percent in calendar year 2013.

I always maintain that investors have to take care of their asset allocation first. After asset allocation, they’ve to take a portfolio approach towards their equity investments. At this point of time, my thinking goes like this. Suppose you have a stock portfolio with stocks from companies with strong balance sheets, robust cash flows and high perception of corporate governance. Such a portfolio may not outperform benchmark indices if the economy quickly makes a turnaround and interest rates start falling.

This is due to the fact that any sharp turnaround accompanied by falling interest rates will benefit highly-leveraged companies and where investors are highly pessimistic about prospects. (Readers have to take my views with a pinch of salt, because I may change my view quickly depending on market dynamics and outlook on economy).

Let me assume that around 70 percent of your money is currently invested in companies with strong cash flows, decent balance sheets, zero debt and high profit margins.

My feeling is that around 20% to 30% of your money can be allocated to companies with moderate debt (means debt-equity ratio of 0.4 to 0.8), strong corporate governance and managements, reasonable but not very high interest coverage ratios, low operating profit margins and with potential to increase capacity utilization in the next 12 to 18 months. (Many companies are at present struggling with low capacity utilization which negatively impacted their profit margins).

The idea is that if and when the expected turnaround happens, these companies with moderate debt will be highly benefited as compared to companies with strong balance sheets and rich valuations—that have already been discovered by the market. You may have observed this kind of churning actually happening to some extent in the market in the last two/three months—select stocks in auto ancillary, NBFC, capital goods and power equipment sectors have risen sharply.  

It goes without saying that higher risk is usually rewarded with higher returns, provided you do your homework properly—peppered with some luck.

Of course, in the long run (beyond three years), companies with strong balance sheets, robust cash flows, pricing power and competitive advantage will continue to perform well. For a long time, I have preferred companies with strong balance sheets, low debt-equity ratios, strong cash flows and high growth potential.

But now I am thinking that as long as around 70 to 80 percent of your money is invested in companies with strong balance sheets, competitive advantage, pricing power and strong profit margins; you can slightly tilt 20 to 30 percent of your money towards companies with moderate debt, strong managements, low interest coverage ratios and low profit margins. This churning can be done in the next six to nine months in a gradual manner—keeping in mind the changing market dynamics, electoral math and progress of India/world economy.

Select PSU stocks may offer some protection from any downside that is anticipated around the 2014 general elections.

This is not to say that India has no problems. As you are aware, India is currently bedeviled with persistently high inflation and moribund investment cycle—not to mention the high cost of subsidies and government policy/regulatory issues. The RBI has kept its option of raising interest rates open.

Government’s fiscal deficit is a problem as revenue collections have slowed down, while non-plan expenditure (mostly subsidies) shoots up. But unfortunately, plan expenditure is being cut according to several reports.

Global problems may continue to haunt the Indian markets going forward. The government’s divestment effort is making very slow progress.

Finance Minster P.Chidambaram has been trying to limit fiscal deficit to the budgeted 4.8 percent (of GDP), through some creative accounting and cut in plan expenditure. Current account deficit was controlled by imposing severe curbs on gold imports.

It is naïve to expect that government diktats can wean Indians away from the allure of gold. Once the gold import curbs are removed, the gold buying spree will come back with a vengeance. The government seems to have made no serious effort to increase and widen export basket and boost manufacturing sector.

Some headway is being made on the policy front, after years of policy logjam by the central government. Subsidies are cut partially in diesel, LPG and petrol. After a decade, Railway fares too have been increased though marginally. Tesco of the UK has announced FDI in multi-brand retail sector in partnership with the Tatas. Abu Dhabi-based Etihad Airways recently bought a 24 percent-stake in India’s Jet Airways. Air Asia of Malaysia is planning a joint venture with Tatas.

Share repurchases (buybacks) by listed companies are happening. Many foreign promoters—like, Unilever, Vodafone plc and Glaxo Pharma—have been increasing their stake in Indian subsidiaries.  In the last two to three years, foreigners seem to be more optimistic about the prospects of select Indian companies rather than Indian investors, who have been selling heavily. FIIs have pumped in USD 20 billion into Indian equities in 2013.

My sense is that BSE 200 broader index may give 15 to 20 percent return in 2014. My optimism stems from the fact that many Indian companies have been able to weather the storms and will be able to generate decent profits and robust cash flows in future also—despite the uncertainties surrounding the political, fiscal and external fronts.   

Notes:

BSE – Bombay Stock Exchange, FII – Foreign Institutional Investor, NSE – National Stock Exchange and PSU – Public Sector Undertakings.

- - -

Disclaimer: The author is an investment analyst, equity investor and freelance writer. The author has a vested interest in the Indian stock markets. This write-up is for information purposes only and should not be taken as investment advice. Investors are advised to consult their financial advisor before taking any investment decisions. He blogs at:



Connect with him on twitter @vrk100