EPS (Earnings Per Share) is broken into three components because a company's earnings per share can increase for only three fundamental reasons:
1) It generates more revenue.
2) It keeps more profit from each dollar of revenue (higher margins).
3) It has fewer shares outstanding.
Note: Due to share buybacks / repurchases, shares outstanding comes down -- less number of shares means EPS growth. On the other hand, if share count increases, EPS comes down.
The mathematical relationship explains it.
EPS or earnings per share = (Revenue × Net Profit Margin) / Shares Outstanding
... since, net income or net profit = revenue × net profit margin
So, the three sources of EPS growth are:
> revenue growth
> margin expansion (net profit margin)
> changes in shares outstanding
The EPS breakdowns helps distinguish between high-quality and potentially weaker earnings growth.
> EPS growth driven by revenue = genuine business expansion
> EPS growth driven by margins = improved efficiency or pricing power
> EPS growth driven by buybacks = financial engineering or capital allocation (not necessarily bad)
Chart 5 showing S&P 500 earnings by sector >
Surprisingly, the biggest contributor of earnings is energy sector (119%) (massive rise in crude oil prices) in 2026, following by Technology and communications services sectors.
Chart 6 showing components of US GDP growth >
Historical averages (2000-2025):
consumption: 67% of nominal GDP
fixed investment: 13%
govt spending: 19%
residential: 4%
net exports: -4%
Chart 7 showing foreign-born share of labour force and labour force participation rate (LFPR) >
Foreign born share of labour force has been growing, but LFPR has been declining over the years.
Main reasons for LFPR decline over the years:
Ageing population (Baby boomers moved out of the labour force)
Declining prime-age male participation
More young adults staying in education and delaying workforce entry
Structural economic shifts: Manufacturing decline, automation and globalisation
Health and social factors
COVID-19 pandemic: Business closures, childcare disruptions, health concerns and early retirements triggered a sharp fall in labour force participation.
From 67% levels in 1997, labour force participation rate has declined to 61.8% in Sep2026.
Chart 8 showing average tariff rates in the US > Trump tariffs >
10.6% Oct2026
15.9% Feb2026
30.0% 08Apr2025 (peak Trump tariffs)
nearly 8% 2024 (prior to Trump tariffs)
Chart 9 showing bond performance when stock returns were negative >
The chart shows only the 25 years between roughly 1930 and 2022 when the S&P 500 had a negative annual return.
Bonds usually rise when stocks fall. In 21 out of those 25 years, bonds delivered positive returns when stocks were negative.
Bonds provide diversification. For example:
1931: Stocks fell 40%, while bonds gained 2%.
2008: Stocks fell 37%, while bonds gained 5%.
1974: Stocks fell 26%, while bonds gained 3%.
But bonds aren't guaranteed protection. In 2022, both stocks and bonds fell significantly:
Stocks: -18%
Bonds: -13%
Stocks drive long-term growth; bonds help reduce portfolio volatility and cushion losses during stock market downturns.
However, the relationship isn't guaranteed. When inflation and interest rates rise sharply, stocks and bonds can fall together.
That's why diversification across asset classes matters.
Chart 10 showing share of global market capitalisation of major countries; and YTD returns of major stock markets globally >
USA 65% of global market cap
EM 11%
Europe ex UK 10%
Japan 5%
YTD returns in USD terms (end-Dec2025 to end-Oct2026) >
11.8% S&P 500
10% EAFE
13.8% EM
17.9% Japan
10.8% UK
-17.9% China
-13.7% India (lack of AI stocks)
56.4% Taiwan (semiconductor / AI boom)
67.4% South Korea (semiconductor / AI boom)
Chart 11 showing cycles of international outperformance and US dollar >
As per this chart: international stocks and US stocks move in long-term cycles of relative outperformance. Those cycles appear to be related to the strength of the US dollar.
It uses rolling 2-year annualized returns.
The purple area shows how much international stocks outperform or underperform US stocks over a rolling two-year period.
Above zero: International stocks outperform U.S. stocks.
Below zero: U.S. stocks outperform international stocks.
For example:
+10% means international stocks outperform by approximately 10 percentage points annually.
-10% means international stocks underperform by approximately 10 percentage points annually.
A simple case for international diversification for US investors away from only US stocks >
2011–22: U.S. stocks enjoyed a prolonged period of dominance.
2023–26: International stocks have begun recovering relative to U.S. stocks.