Rama Krishna Vadlamudi,
|
||
When the quick-tempered sage Durvasa
entered sage Kanva’s hermitage; Shankuntala, the beautiful young lady, is in
deep thoughts pining and day dreaming about her beloved husband, Dushyanta, the
king of Hastinapura. Slighted by her absent-mindedness, sage Durvasa curses
Shakuntala that her lover would forget her. At the end of this well-known
story, Abhijnanashakuntalam*, written
by renowned Sankrit poet Kalidasa, Durvasa’s curse is lifted as Dushyanta
recognizes and embraces his wife Shakuntala upon seeing the ring he gifted her.
At long last, Manmohan Singh seems
to have woken up from a self-imposed curse and has come back to the
centre-stage of governing the country once again by pushing through various
reforms amidst raucous opposition from other political parties. In his earlier
avatar as finance minister in the early 1990s, he loved economic reforms and
brought in path-breaking decisions which have now put India on a pedestal in the international
arena. He has earned good reputation for his personal honesty; and as an
economist and RBI governor also.
But in his new avatar as India ’s prime
minister since 2004, he has given the impression that his government was a
lame-duck government hemmed in from all sides by various controversies over
misallocation of 2G spectrum and coal blocks; and various policy indecisions. Another
impression was that he was protecting some powerful and dishonest ministers and
not taking any collective responsibility for the actions and misdeeds of his
government.
Owing to his stony silence and
inability to communicate with common people, the general perception is that he
is at the helm only to serve the needs of the ruling Congress (I) party headed
by Sonia Gandhi and ultimately it is expected that he would pass on the baton
to Rahul Gandhi, son of Sonia and Rajiv (late) Gandhi. However, this is only in
the realm of speculation.
(*Abhijnanashakuntalam
is loosely translated as Recognition of Shakuntala)
Pushing
for Economic Reforms
India was racing like a gazelle
posting record economic growth rates of 8 to 9 per cent between 2003-04 and
2007-08, but the gazelle was caught by a large Indian python of indecision,
misallocation of natural resources, dithering and prevarication – constricting
India’s economic growth rate, which has fallen to as low as 5.3 to 5.5 per cent
in the recent two quarters.
After a gap of almost two years, the
self-imposed curse is lifted for the good of the country. And Manmohan Singh’s
government has now recognized the importance of providing good governance to
Indians. In the last few days, his government has taken a number of measures
aimed at boosting India ’s
economic growth, controlling fiscal deficit and providing more jobs to the unemployed.
On Thursday, the 13th of
September 2012, diesel price was increased by Rs 5 per liter (including taxes)
aimed at slashing the fiscal deficit and reducing the burden on public sector
oil marketing/upstream oil companies.
The next day the government has
decided to allow foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail and
civil aviation sector and enhanced the ceiling for foreign investment in
broadcasting sector (see details below).
The Manmohan Singh government received
scathing criticism for almost two years for lack of economic reforms. Now, his
government seems to be serious in reversing the perception. The PM himself
described the latest decisions as:
“The Cabinet has taken many decisions today
to bolster economic growth and make
|
A gist of
cabinet’s decisions on 14 September 2012:
1. FDI In Multi-Brand Retail:
ü Foreign Direct Investment of up to
51 per cent is now allowed in multi-brand retail (This decision was kept in abeyance since November 2011 in the face of
opposition from various quarters)
ü State Governments can allow
setting up these retail outlets subject to state laws
ü Such retail outlets can be set up
only in cities with population of more than 10 lakh as per 2011 Census
ü At least 50 per cent of the total FDI
brought in must be spent in ‘backend infrastructure’ – within three years of
the induction of FDI
2. FDI in Civil Aviation sector:
ü
Foreign airlines
(existing policy allows only foreign investors other than airlines to invest in
aviation sector) are now allowed to make FDI of up to 49 per cent in schedule
and non-schedule airlines
ü
For example, British
Airways can now invest in Kingfisher Airlines or Spicejet Airlines (not that the
foreign airlines would find it attractive to invest in debt-ridden and loss-making
Indian companies in the aviation sector)
ü
The 49 per cent limit would
subsume FDI and FII investment
ü
Substantial ownership and
effective control shall rest with Indian nationals
ü
The total FDI inflows into the air transport sector,
during January, 2000 – April, 2012, were USD 434.75 million – which is just
0.25 percent of the total FDI inflows
3. FDI in Power Trading Exchanges
ü
Foreign investment is now permitted
up to 49 per cent (26% FDI & 23% FII limit)
ü As per extant policy, FDI of up to
100 per cent in the power sector (except atomic energy) is already permitted
ü As per extant policy, foreign
investment of up to 49 per cent (26% FDI limit and 23% FII limit) is already
permitted in stock exchanges and depositories
4. Review of FDI policy in Broadcasting
sector:
ü Foreign investment limit is now raised
from the current 49 per cent to 74 per cent for companies operating in direct
to home (DTH), teleports and cable networks
ü Foreign investment of up to 74 per
cent is now permitted in Mobile TV
5. Disinvestment of 9 to 12 per
cent is permitted in four public sector companies, namely, Hindustan Copper,
MMTC Ltd, Oil India, and National Aluminium Company.
Support
for Reforms
As described by the prime minister,
these decisions are to be welcomed by all people, no doubt. For example, the
diesel subsidy burden is taking a heavy toll on companies, like, BPCL, HPCL,
IOC, ONGC, GAIL and Oil India .
These companies are unable to invest, at the desired level, in new capacities
or explorations. This has negatively impacted the nation’s energy security in
the last nine years. Just consider the total loss suffered by BPCL, HPCL and
IOC for the April-June 2012 quarter – it’s a staggering Rs 40,500 crore!
The people need to ask who is
providing for these subsidies and from whose pockets the subsidies are
recovered. The truth is that the government is giving from one hand and taking
away the benefit from another hand and the net result is zero benefit to common
people. We need to understand this basic reality.
To
know more about the oil subsidy burden, just click:
|
The Case
for FDI in multi-brand retail sector
As per the latest FDI policy, respective
state governments are vested with powers to give licenses to companies that
want to bring in FDI in multi-brand retail outlets. The central government’s
decision to allow FDI is enabling provision for state governments to act. If a
specific state government is not comfortable with central government’s FDI policy,
the state government is free to not allow such outlets.
But one important point to note here
is that in the last decade, most of the state governments have been competing
with one another to attract capital investments to their own states by
providing a number of incentives. Gujarat, Maharashtra ,
Karnataka and Tamil Nadu state governments are in the forefront to entice large
companies of late. So, competition may force majority of states to allow FDI in
multi-brand retail outlets.
As part of the new policy, a lot of
investments will be made in the back-end infrastructure, which includes, investment in processing, manufacturing, distribution, design
improvement, quality control, packaging, transport, logistics, storage,
ware-house, agriculture market produce infrastructure; excluding investments on front-end units.
Without any doubt, the new FDI
policy on multi-brand retail outlets will be beneficial to farmers as well as
consumers.
Is there
any flipside to FDI in retail?
Yes, there will be some negatives.
We need to prepare ourselves for some small sacrifices for the sake of greater
good. India is evolving and we need to
welcome a lot of changes. Some opposition parties, especially the Bharatiya
Janata Party, are giving the impression that this new policy will result in
loss of livelihood for millions of people. This is a blatant lie on the part of
BJP and other parties. It is very clear that BJP is opposing the government’s
policy just for the sake of opposition. The party is resorting to a
disinformation campaign.
When computerization was introduced
in the banking sector, there was a huge opposition to it. Computerization has
not resulted in job losses. The sons of trade union leaders who stridently
opposed bank computerization have now been working in large multi-national IT
companies! The trade union leaders just bluffed the nation at that time.
What are
the political ramifications?
The ruling Congress (I) party seems
to have taken a calculated risk – they may have consulted some of their allies
before pushing for economic reforms. Or, the ruling party may be thinking
enough is enough. Mamata Banerji, chief minister of West Bengal, expects some
economic revival package for West Bengal and
so is Uttar Pradesh state government led by Samajwadi Party. May be, the
central government will appease the allies through certain measures. It is
hoped the present UPA government will last its full term till 2014. But watch
out!
Conclusion
Real foreign investment, however,
will take some more time to come. It may take as long as six quarters to two
years for actual setting up of multi-brand retail outlets in India . Because
the companies have to get a lot of approvals and various conditions are
attached to the policies. We need to be realistic about this.
Diesel price increase of Rs 5 per
liter is only symbolic as it would not bring down the fiscal deficit
considerably. However, it needs to be grudgingly accepted that some times
symbolism or tokenism helps to some extent.
At long last, the central government
seems to have woken up from the deep slumber by pushing for economic reforms.
The government’s policies for allowing FDI in multi-brand retail and civil
aviation sectors and raising diesel prices are to be welcomed wholeheartedly.
Some of these are enabling provisions for attracting foreign investment to
Indian shores. These measures will definitely enhance India ’s attractiveness for foreign
investors.
- - -
Notes: FDI
– Foreign Direct Investment; FII – Foreign Institutional Investors
and RBI – Reserve Bank of India .
Hastinapura of yesteryears is considered to be modern Delhi .
Disclaimer: This should not be
construed as a recommendation by the author. The author has a vested interest
in the stock market going up. The views of the author are personal and he
changes his views on the market and economy very quickly depending on various
factors. Readers or investors must consult their certified financial advisors
before taking any decision on their investments.
The Government of India had on 20 September 2012 notified its decisions on allowing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail, civil aviation sector, broadcasting sector and power exchanges. The GOI has also notified its decision to allow 100% FDI in single-brand retail.
ReplyDelete