Showing posts with label food security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label food security. Show all posts

Wednesday, 15 November 2023

India Per Capita Income in Dollars - vrk100 - 15Nov2023

India Per Capita Income in Dollars

 
 
 
 

 (This is for information purposes only. This should not be construed as a recommendation or investment advice even though the author is a CFA Charterholder. Please consult your financial adviser before taking any investment decision. Safe to assume the author has a vested interest in stocks / investments discussed if any.)   
 
 
(All the updates, effective Jul2024, on per capita income in US dollars, are available in Indian Economy Data Bank)
 
 
According to World Bank data for 2022, India is the fifth largest economy in the world by gross domestic product (GDP). But in terms of per capita income, it is at around 140th rank, indicating India is at the bottom of the pile on a per capita basis. 
 
Per capita income is calculated by dividing a nation's population by its total national income.
 
India became world’s most populous nation this year, surpassing China. Our population is considered as our strength. But in terms of income inequality, it can be described as our weakness because India’s potential does not get reflected when one compares indicators based on per capita income.
 
 
1. India per capita income
 
India’s per capita gross national income in 2022 is 2,380 US dollars. Gross national income (GNI) is the income earned by a nation’s residents irrespective of where it is earned. It can be calculated by adding income from foreign countries to country’s gross domestic product (GDP).
 
Comparatively, the world’s average per capita income is USD 12,804 in 2022. So, India's per capita income is less than 20 percent of world's. The data are from World Bank’s World Development Indicators updated as on 26Oct2023.
 
Though India is world’s fifth largest economy, its per capita income gets depressed due to its population. Indian rupee’s depreciation against the US dollar also depresses India’s per capita income expressed in US dollars.
 
The official data used here is per capita GNI or gross national income. But the term ‘per capita income’ will be used here for simplicity.

 

Table 1: India per capita income since 2000:



As show in table 1 above, India’s per capita income in US dollars increased from USD 440 in 2000 to USD 2,380 in 2022, with an absolute growth of 441 percent and an annualised growth rate of 7.98 percent – which is quite impressive in a period of 22 years.
 
From the table 1, one could observe the fastest growing years for India after 2000 are 2004, 2005, 2007, 2011, 2009 and 2006 with a year-on-year growth of 17.6, 16.7, 16.7, 12.4, 12.1 and 11.4 percent respectively. 
 
The growth of 13.2 percent in 2021 is an anomaly because 2020 saw a severe decline of 8.7 percent in per capita income in dollars due to draconian COVID-19 lockdowns imposed by the Indian federal government.
 
 
(blog continues below)
------------------------------
 
Related blogs:
 
Slowest growth in India's real per capita income

Why is India Falling Behind Bangladesh?

India Second Quarter GDP 30Nov2021
 
------------------------------
2. India per capita income growth in five-year intervals
 
To normalise for year-on-year differences, let us see how the growth occurred over a period of five-year intervals from 1962 to 2022. The World Bank data for India’s per capita income are available from 1962 onward.
 
Table 2: India per capita growth 1962 to 2022 (5-year intervals):

 


As shown in Table 2, the fastest growth periods, in five-year intervals, in per capita income in dollars are: 2002 to 2007 with an absolute growth of 97.8 percent in five years; 2007 to 2012 with an absolute growth of 61.5 percent and 1972 to 1977 with an absolute growth of 58.3 percent.
 
Incidentally, Manmohan Singh is India’s prime minister between 2004 and 2014 and Indira Gandhi was the country’s prime minister between 1972 to 1977 (for most of the time).
 
Between 1987 and 1992, India's per capita income declined by 2.9 percent due to a combination of listless economic growth and devaluation and depreciation of Indian rupee against the US dollar.
 
But in the past 10 years, the 5-year absolute growth rates are low compared to 2002-2012 periods. Between 2012 and 2017, India's per capita income grew by just 22.4 percent (total five years) and it improved to 32.2 percent (total five years) between 2017 and  2022.

Indian rupee devaluation:
 
The numbers after 1991 are not strictly comparable with those before 1991, because there was a regime change in 1991 not only for India’s dollar-rupee exchange rate but also for the entire Indian economy. 
 
Indian rupee was devalued in two stages in 1991 with a cumulative devaluation of 18 percent in US dollar terms. Dollar - rupee exchange rate was not market-determined before 1991.
 
Since 01Mar1992, Reserve Bank of India, India’s central bank, introduced a dual exchange rate system called Liberalised Exchange Rate Management System (LERMS). It was replaced by a unified exchange rate system on 27Feb1993 to make the exchange rate market-determined. 
 
India's current exchange rate system is not full float, but often dubbed as 'managed float.'
 
 
3. Comparison with comparable countries
 
Most of the things in life are relative. Let us examine how India stacks up in the world in terms of per capita income.
 
Comparable countries, like, BRICS, G20 and others are included in table 3 below to see how India performs. As per World Bank’s 2022 data about per capita GNI of October 2023, India is a lower middle income country. 
 
Table 3: Comparison with comparable nations:

         
The World Bank categorised India as a lower middle income country. As can be seen from table 3 above, India’s per capita income is the lowest not only among the G20 but also among BRICS countries.
 
It may not advisable to compare a lower middle income nation with high income nations, but even among lower middle income countries, India's income per head is lower than that of Bangladesh, Egypt and Vietnam.
 
The per capita incomes of other BRICS nations, Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa are much higher than that of India (table 3 above). 
 
Among upper middle income category, Malayasia, Libya, Colombia, Botswana and Iraq have per capita incomes far higher than that of India. 
 
Countries, like, Kenya, Nigeria, Nicaragua and Burma (all lower middle income nations) have incomes lower than that of India, as per World Bank's 2022 data.
 
 
4. Summary
 
India may be the world's fifth largest economy but its ranking in per capita income is quite low -- even lower among comparable countries, like, Bangladesh, Egypt, Vietnam, South Africa and Russia.
 
In 2022, India's per capita income is USD 2,380, which is much lower than the world average of USD 12,804.
 
The current narrative is crossing the USD-2,000 per capita income threshold is a turning point for countries in the past and the same can be extrapolated to India. India surpassed this threshold once in 2019 and again in 2021 – after having down below the level in 2020.
 
The expectation has gained ground in recent years so that India can leapfrog to USD 5 trillion. To put it mildly, this is a narrative propagated by some people to suit their interests.
 
When it comes to growth in per capita income and overall economic growth, the record of current Indian federal government is quite tepid, despite the hype and propaganda.
 
This is not an attempt to analyse India’s prospects on a single metric like per capita income but to put things in the perspective and throw some light on the income disparity that has been bedeviling the country for several years.
 
The income inequality has worsened since the COVID-19 outbreak, with economists and experts talking of a K-shaped recovery in the country in the past three years. 
 
Hundreds of millions of Indians are still in poverty – this is buttressed by the fact that the Indian federal government recently decided to extend its free food grains programme to more than 800 million Indians by a period of five years.
 
It is fair to argue per capita GNI PPP is more relevant from India's viewpoint (we can discuss this another time in more detail) than per capita GNI merely. GNI PPP is GNI based on purchasing power parity, which adjusts for the purchasing power relatively.
 
For example, India’s per capita income may be low, but the purchasing power of Rs 100 is much higher in India compared to say, in the United States. To put differently, an average meal may be available for just Rs 100 in India; the same meal may cost more than Rs 400 or Rs 450 in the US.
 
It is hoped governments in India will make sincere efforts to economically lift millions of Indians still languishing in poverty and bring down the income equality in a meaningful way in the next decade.

 

- - -

------------------------------
 
P.S. dated 29Nov2023:  Food security:
 
PIB press release dated 29Nov2023:  Free Foodgrains for 81.35 crore beneficiaries for five years: Cabinet Decision

Historic decision for Food and Nutrition Security : Centre to spend approximately Rs. 11.80 lakh crore in the next 5 years on food subsidy under PMGKAY
 

------------------------------
 
References:
 
World Bank World Development Indicators (updated 26Oct2023)

World Bank India per capita GNI (chart available)
 
RBIcrisis and reforms 1991 to 2000 - chronology of events - Indian rupee devaluation in 1991 / LERMS / unified exchange rate
 
RBIpress release 27Feb1993 – Unified exchange rate from LERMS
 
PIBcircular 15Nov2023 - India providing food grains

Macrotrends India per capita GNI (graph available) (India's historical data for every year is available from 1962 to 2022; and so is data about comparable countries' per capita GNI)
 
Additional Data:
 
India per capita GNI (in current US dollars) - starting from 1965 to 2020 in five-year intervals to compare how that data stands over five-year intervals:

 
 
G20 – Group of 20 countries
 

 
BRICS – group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa
 
------------------------------
 
Read more:
 
Blog of Blogs Theme-wise 
 
RBI Annual Report and HBIE  - Data Tables
 
India Foreign Exchanges Reserves Comfortable 
 
Analysis of Small Savings Schemes and Interest Rates

 
India Debuts 50-year Sovereign Bond

India: Prospects and Challenges
 
India Public Debt and Floating Rate Bonds
  
India Equity ETFs Worth Considering

JP Morgan Guide to Markets Sep2023 
 
Mutual Fund Asset Class Returns 30Sep2023
 
Divergence in Volatile Global Bond Yields 
 
India's Crude Oil Import Dependency Jumps under Modi
 
Buyback Offers and Weblinks
 
Negative Impact of Debt Mutual Fund Tax Changes

Weblinks and Investing

-------------------

Disclosure:  I've vested interested in Indian stocks and other investments. It's safe to assume I've interest in the financial instruments / products discussed, if any.

Disclaimer: The analysis and opinion provided here are only for information purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. Investors should consult their own financial advisers before making any investments. The author is a CFA Charterholder with a vested interest in financial markets. 

CFA Charter credentials  - CFA Member Profile

CFA Badge

 

He blogs at:

https://ramakrishnavadlamudi.blogspot.com/

https://www.scribd.com/vrk100

X (Twitter) @vrk100

Friday, 5 July 2013

Food Security Bill-Hope for the Hungry or Just Hype?-VRK100-05Jul2013






Rama Krishna Vadlamudi, HYDERABAD   05 July 2013

As the cliché goes, India is a kaleidoscope of contrasts. On the one hand you’ve plenty of food grains rotting in government warehouses and on the other millions of hungry and malnourished mouths have been craving for two square meals a day.

Amidst such chaos, the Union Cabinet on 3 July 2013 approved an ordinance on the National Food Security Bill (NFSB) and the President has since given his assent for the ordinance. This bill will have to be ratified by the Parliament. This write-up aims to analyze the issues concerning the NFSB and its consequences.

The Government Version:

The Government of India enlists the objectives of the bill as:

---Up to sixty-seven percent of the population would be provided a uniform entitlement of five kilograms per person per month at highly subsidized prices of Rs 3, Rs 2, Rs 1 per kg for rice, wheat, or coarse grains respectively

---This is a legal right for each individual in the eligible families—covering 75% of the rural population and 50% of the urban population

 ---An amount of 61.23 million tonnes of food grains is needed annually for implementing this programme (as per current estimates)

 ---The subsidy cost to the government is Rs 1,24,700 crore during 2013-14

 ---This will be done thro the current Targeted Public Distribution System (PDS)

 ---There will be a special focus on nutritional support to women and children

 ---The eligible households will be identified by the respective state governments

The Other Version:

Before discussing the merits of the Food Security Bill, let us examine the track record of the PDS, through which the government is aiming to provide food security. Every Indian knows how effective the PDS is in distributing subsidized food to the needy. PDS is a miserable flop. This distribution system is highly corrupt and a substantial portion of the public money is swallowed by fair price shop traders, corrupt officials, etc. Only a small part of the benefits reaches the intended beneficiaries. The leakages from the PDS have been well documented by various auditors and other government arms.  

There is no doubt that unless the PDS is overhauled completely, all the loopholes are plugged and it is made more effective, providing food security to the millions of population will remain a mirage—despite the stated intentions of the government. 

However, some states seems to be more effective in providing food security through the PDS—notable examples being Chhatisgarh, Kerala and Tamil Nadu.

Problem of Buffer Stocks, Storage and Transportation:

To meet the annual requirement of food security bill, we need to keep 61.23 million tonnes of food grains as operational stocks. In addition, we need to have strategic reserves for meeting any output shortfall—arising out of drought or floods or transport problems. It may be recalled that in 2002-03, total output of rice and wheat dropped by 28.5 mt (absolute change) due to drought. Such an output shortfall will lead to severe problems in implementing food security.

As per CACP, the strategic reserves have to be kept either in physical form or in the form of foreign exchange reserves. Foreign exchange reserves are necessary to import food grains during emergencies. So, we need to keep aside some portion of foreign exchange reserves exclusively to meet the import (if any) of food grains.

The current buffer stock norm (for rice and wheat) is 31.9 mt as of 1st July each year. Our actual stocks as on 1.7.12 were 80.2 mt. It is estimated that the actual stocks as on 1.7.13 would be about 82.2 mt. This is against the available covered storage capacity with FCI and State agencies of 53.4 mt. This means that we have only 65 percent covered storage capacity—53.4 mt storage capacity versus the required 82.2 mt. So the governments have completely failed in providing the required storage capacity.

Indian Railways is unable to provide enough rakes to transport the food grains across the breadth and length of the country. On this front also, the government’s failure is clear.

Distorting the Market Dynamics:

Large-scale public procurement will drive the private sector out of the market. The NFSB may lead to some unintended consequences—such as higher support prices, rising food prices, higher labour and input costs, etc. This means that the market prices of food grains will be largely determined by the government procurement and PDS requirements.

Actual Cost of the Bill:

Moreover, the total subsidy cost for the NFSB will be Rs 2,00,000 crore per annum and not Rs 1,25,000 crore as claimed by the government. This has been stated in a discussion paper (No. 6 prepared by Ashok Gulati and Surbhi Jain) put out by the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices, or CACP, under the Ministry of Agriculture.

The amount of Rs 2,00,000 crore includes not only the cost of food grains, but also the cost of storage and transportation. Excess buffer stocks should be stored to take care of NFSB—this leads to inefficient allocation of government’s scarce resources. As of now, an amount of Rs 80,000 crore (as per CACP) is locked up in excess stocks without serving any worthwhile purpose. This excess money is injected into the system leading to rising rice and wheat prices, while food grains are allowed to rot in warehouses.

Out of the expected subsidy cost of Rs 1,25,000 crore for the current financial year, the central government had already budgeted for Rs 90,000 crore for food subsidy in 2013-14. So, the government needs to provide an extra Rs 35,000 crore this year.

More bureaucrats will be provided employment for implementing and monitoring the PDS for ensuring food security.

On Balance…

There is an urgent need to ensure that adequate food is made available to the hungry mouths. Renowned and Nobel-Prize winning economist, Amartya Sen, has expressed his views in favour of providing legal entitlement to the malnourished and underprivileged classes of India, though he has pointed out certain flaws in the NFSB.

It’s unfortunate that the NFSB had to be promulgated by the President rather than passed through the Parliament. The central government seems to be having its own reasons for rushing the NFSB through the ordinance route rather than through the Parliament.

In the backdrop of the utterly-failed PDS, insufficient storage capacity, severe transport problems, no noticeable gains in agricultural productivity due to lack of farm investment, huge subsidy burden and inefficient allocation of resources; it is difficult to say whether the food security bill will be able to achieve its desired objective of providing legal entitlement of minimum food grains to the underprivileged. One saving grace is that we have plenty of stocks at present to take care of food security. Let us hope that monsoon will continue be favorable and farm output will be stable in the coming years.

- - -
Abbreviations:

FCI         : Food Corporation of India
mt           : million tonnes
NFSB     : National Food Security Bill

Reference: Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP)

Disclaimer: The author is an investment analyst and freelance writer. His articles on financial markets and Indian economy can be reached at: