Wednesday 24 February 2010

GREECE DEBT CRISIS-A Greek Tragedy Amid Double-dip Recession Fears-VRK100-16022010

GREECE DEBT CRISIS -A Greek Tragedy Amid Double-dip Recession Fears


Rama Krishna Vadlamudi                February 16th, 2010

www.scribd.com/vrk100

If you want to read this document in a READER-FRIENDLY PDF DOCUMENT, just click: www.scribd.com/doc/26955409

Why do we love tragedies?

The ILIAD is one of the greatest classics of Greek civilization. The epic poem is attributed to Homer and is passed on to generations through songs and poems. It is a magnum opus which is unrivalled in the world of literature and is an epitome of Western Civilization. It transports you into a world where you inhale all the smells of war, heroism, lust, compassion and humanity. The story of Iliad revolves around the tragic events of Trojan War, leading to the killing of Hektor by Achilleus, that determines the fate of Troy.

The Iliad is a Greek tragedy and is adored by countless generations of people around the world. Why do we like tragedies? What is in it for us to feel immense pleasure from tragedies? Well, this is a difficult question to answer. These Greek tragedies centre around a hero, who is typically a nobleman of royal blood and is a victim of circumstances and who dies at the end of the tragedy. May be, we find pleasure in the fact that we are in less worse position as compared to our tragic icon in the novel. May be, it is simply a case of us finding solace in others’ suffering.

Now, we are dealing with a different kind of tragedy, an economic one in Greece which has plunged the country into a deeper and deeper mess. It is an insolvency trap for Greece; while the Government has been struggling to pull the country out of the fiscal quagmire that is caused by its own actions and inactions.

Let us examine the events surrounding this new Greek tragedy with some questions:

What are the causes of the crisis in Greece?

The country is facing a huge sovereign debt problem, which is forecast at 125 per cent of its GDP for the year 2010. Over a period of several years, Greek economy has become less competitive in relation to other Eurozone countries and this has compounded the problems for the country. Its unemployment rate is hovering around 10 per cent. Greece joined the Euro in 2001 and has benefited immensely from it. However, it went on a spending spree and as a result the government debt has mounted. Simply put, it is a case of living beyond one’s means. What has angered the most is the fact that Greece has hidden its debt woes with doctored figures.

Greece's budget deficit is at 12.7%, which is more than four times higher than Euro area rules allow. Eurozone rules stipulate that member countries shall restrict their budget deficit to three per cent of their GDP.

Ever since the Dubai Debt Crisis flared up in November 2009, the debt problem of Greece has rattled the financial markets. Read my article: www.scribd.com/doc/23330863

What does the acronym PIGS mean?

It stands for Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain; the countries that are plagued with high debt as compared to its GDP. The debt problems of these countries can be gauged from the fact that their gross sovereign debt as a percentage of GDP stands at 85%, 83%, 125% and 66% respectively. Almost all these countries have reported negative GDP growth or negligible growth rates last year. The problem has been exacerbated by high unemployment rates at 10.4%, 13.3%, 9.7% and 19.5% respectively for Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain. The high unemployment rate will put a drag on the economic recovery in the years ahead in these countries.

Now, financial markets have extended the acronym to PIIGS, including Italy in addition to these four countries. Italy is notorious for its indebtedness for several years. The Greek woes have reached the shores of other countries and there are fears of a double dip recession in the developed markets even as China, India and other emerging economies are powering ahead with a strong shift in the balance of power. The emerging countries are offering sunshine through dark clouds dispelling the fears of double dip recession in the world.

Will the European Union bail out Greece?

Last week, EU leaders met at Brussels and discussed the developments in Greece. The European leaders at the meeting have pledged full support for Greece, but no details of the action plan were divulged.

Today, the Eurozone finance ministers, after meeting in Brussels, have told Greece to do more cuts in public expenditure and public sector wages or face economic sanctions. It is clear from the statements of the EU leaders that other member nations of Euro area are not prepared to pay for Greece’s blunders. They have given Greece time up to March 16th to clear its financial mess.

It’s too much to expect that Greece’s problems will be blown away by pronouncements from European/EU leaders. Strong countries in Euro area, like, Germany and France, are reluctant to bail out directly and they want a strong commitment from Greece to keep its house in order.

Will Greeks tolerate further economic sanctions?

Will Greeks tolerate any economic sanctions that may be imposed by the Greece’s government as part of the bail-out package from the EU?

If Greece has to come out of its fiscal problems, it has to raise tax rates, cut public expenditure, reduce public sector wages, raise fuel prices and undertake other austerity measures. The country has already taken some of these measures. However, these measures are definitely going to anger the public sentiment in the country. May be, they do not have a choice except swallowing the bitter pill if at all they have to come out the debt trap.

What is the impact of this Greek insolvency trap?

The Euro currency has been severely battered against the US dollar in the last one month leading to a currency crisis in Europe. After reaching a low of 1.3550 against the US dollar on Friday (after the announcement of a 0.1 per cent GDP growth in the Euro area for the fourth quarter of 2009), the Euro has rallied a little and is now quoting on Tuesday at around 1.3750. There are fears that the problems in Greece may spill over to the remaining 15 countries in the Eurozone. As the Eurozone countries have a common currency, the impact will be felt more in the Eurozone area. As Eurozone is the second largest economic bloc after the US, this may have ramifications for the rest of world in terms of lesser trade and fewer economic opportunities.

The Greek imbroglio has put a big question mark on the sovereign debt of several countries. Some analysts aver that the risk premium for government debt has gone up substantially in the aftermath of this Greek debt trap. This has complicated matters for the monetary policy of European Central Bank.

The stock markets around the world have given up their gains to an extent of five to 10 per cent in the last two weeks or so. The participants are still approaching the stock markets gingerly.

Who are finding pleasure in this Greek financial tragedy?

The traders from Chicago Mercantile Exchange to Hong Kong stock market! They have exploited the fears in the currency markets and started shorting the Euro currency heavily. The Euro has fallen heavily against both the US dollar and Pound Sterling. In the process, the traders made heavy profits from the Euro currency crisis. The same is the case with stock markets around the world, which were affected negatively to an extent of up to 10 per cent.

Who will benefit from a weaker Euro?

All is not lost with a weaker Euro. A weaker Euro will push up exports from the Euro area significantly. Higher export revenues will push up investments and which in turn may lead to more jobs in these economies. Especially, German exports will get a strong boost as its economy is in a much better shape as compared to the other countries that use Euro as their currency.

Germany’s budget deficit is only 3.5% of its GDP while that of the UK, Greece, Spain and Ireland stands in the range of 11% to 13% of their GDP, according to a 2009 forecast.

Whether the Eurozone will break up?

The biggest fear that is staring at the face of financial markets is whether Greece will come out of Euro leading to the break-up of Eurozone. At this point of time, the idea may be a bit far-fetched. The stronger member nations in the Eurozone area may ultimately rescue Greece by imposing harsher conditionalities on the fledgling Greece. As such, at this point of time, the chances of a break-up are remote unless something dramatic happens in Greece politically.

What is the outlook for the Greek economy?

Greece has to decrease its budget deficit by 4% (or 400 basis points) of its GDP this year. Greece needs to undertake serious economic reforms to come out of this tragedy, which is own making. As mentioned above, it has undertaken certain austerity measures already. The role of European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund needs to be watched closely.

Meanwhile, growth in the Eurozone has remained sluggish in 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Eurozone economy has shown a growth of only 0.1 per cent. Germany’s economy too remained sluggish. For the whole year 2009, the Eurozone economy has contracted by a massive four per cent.

EU leaders pledged support to Greece at their Brussels Summit a few days ago. But the Eurozone finance ministers have given a deadline of March 16th for Greece to shore up its internal finances at their meeting on Tuesday. Germany, the largest economy and an industrial powerhouse in Europe, is reluctant to offer a lifeline to Greece. Germany is known for its fiscal discipline with fiscal deficit under full control. They are not the type of people to live beyond their means. Germany’s internal domestic demand may be a booster for Greece.

It is interesting to note what the respected economist Paul Krugman had to tell on all this in an article: "The real story behind Europe's troubles lies not in the deficit but in the policy elites, who pushed the Continent into adopting a single currency well before the Continent was ready for such an experiment."

This is not the end of woes for Greece. As they say, all the Greek dramas end up as tragedies and it would be better if we brace ourselves for some more volatility.


To know more about Eurozone, ECB and the Euro…

To know more about Eurozone, ECB and the Euro, read my article “ECB and its key policy interest rates.” To read it, JUST CLICK: www.scribd.com/doc/20134025


PS: The buzz is that it’s not Great Britain, but Greek Britain!

THE BEST OF MY STUFF ON    Reads


http://www.scribd.com/vrk100



1. Goods and Services Tax-GST-an introduction             4 390

2. Income Tax Slabs 2009-10 for Salaried Class            3 685

3. Direct Taxes Code Bill 2009-analysis                        1 777

4. Public Provident Fund PPF ac-Little Known Facts     1 650

5. Currency Futures in India-MCX and NSE to introduce to 3 new currency pairs 1 322

6. Govt Securities Market in India and Bond Duration Management 1 163

TOTAL READS have already crossed 41,400!

From A Total of 83 Documents in less than six months


                                                         
                                                             Photo courtesy: Penguin India

Sunday 7 February 2010

WHO'S WHO IN INDIA-Political, Administrative and Business-wise-VRK100-007022010

WHO'S WHO IN INDIA


Rama KrishnaVadlamudi                                  February 7, 2010

www.scribd.com/vrk100                           vrk_100@yahoo.co.in

If You Want To Read This Document in READER-FRIENDLY PDF Document, JUST CLICK:

www.scribd.com/doc/26495563


CONTENTS                      PAGE

1. Who’s Who in India – POLITICAL 1



2. Who’s Who in India – ADMINISTRATION 2



3. Who’s Who in India – BUSINESS 3

POLITICAL

Name of the Person     What is he/she?


Pratibha Devisingh Patil President (Rashtrapathi)

Mohd. Hamid Ansari Vice President

Manmohan Singh Prime Minister

Pranab Mukherjee Finance Minister

Anand Sharma Commerce Minister

Kapil Sibal Education Minister

S M Krishna Foreign Minister

P Chidambaram Home Minister

Murli Deora Petroleum Minister

Sushil Kumar Shinde Power

Sharad Pawar Agriculture Minister

Kamalnath Minister for Roads and Highways

A K Antony Defence Minister

A Raja Communications and IT Minister

Salman Kursheed Corporate Affairs Minister (MoS)

Jairam Ramesh Environment Minister (Minister of State)

Praful Patel Civil Aviation Minister (MoS)

ADMINISTRATION

Name of the Person   What is he/she?


Manmohan Singh Chairman, Planning Commission

Ashok Chawla Finance Secretary

Nirupama Rao Foreign Secretary

Montek Singh Ahluwalia Dy. Chairman, Planning Commission

C Rangarajan Chairman, Prime Minister's Economic Advisory Council

Kaushik Basu Chief Economic Advisor, Ministry of Finance

Pronab Sen Chief Statistician and Secretary in the Minstry of Statistics and Programme Implementation

K G Balakrishnan Chief Justice of Supreme Court

G E Vahanvati Attorney General

Gopal Subramaniam Solicitor General

Gen. Deepak Kapoor Chief of Army Staff

Admiral Nirmal Varma Chief of Naval Staff

Air Marshal Pradeep Vasant Naik Chief of Air Staff

K M Chandrasekhar Cabinet Secretary

Shiv Shankar Menon National Security Advisor

Vijay Kelkar Non-executive Chairman, National Stock Exchange

Vijay Kelkar Former Chairman of 13th Finance Commission

Nandan Nilekani Chairman, Unique Identification Authority of India

C B Bhave Chairman, SEBI

D Subbarao Governor, RBI

J Harinarayan Chairman, IRDA

Yogendra Agarwal (yet to take charge) Chairman, PFRDA

BUSINESS

Name of the Person What is he/she?

A M Naik CEO, Larsen and Toubro

Adi Godrej Chairman, Godrej Group

Anil Ambani Head, Reliance ADAG Group

Azim Premji Chairman & CEO, WIPRO

B Prasad Rao CMD, BHEL

Chanda Kochchar CEO, ICICI Bank

Kumarmangalam Birla Head, AVBirla Group of Companies

Manoj Kohli CEO, Bharti Airtel (Global Operations)

Mukesh Ambani Chairman & CEO, Reliance Industries

N Chandrasekharan CEO, TCS

N R Narayanamurthy Chief Mentor and Chairman, Infosys Technologies

O P Bhatt Chairman, State Bank Group

S Gopalakrishnan CEO, Infosys Technologies

R S Sharma * CMD, ONGC

R S Sharma * CMD, NTPC

(* These two are different persons)

Ratan Tata Chairman, Tata Group of Companies

Sanjay Kapoor CEO, Bharti Airtel (India Operations)

Sarthak Behuria CMD, IOC

Shikha Sharma CEO, Axis Bank

Sunil Mittal Non-executiv-e Chairman, Bharti Airtel Group

Y C Deveshwar CEO, ITC



BEST OF MY STUFF ON www.scribd.com/vrk100


Name of the Document                                                                                   Reads

1. Goods and Services Tax - First Discussion Paper on GST                             4 229

2. Income Tax Slabs 2009-10 - Resident Individuals, HUFs, etc                       3 616

3. Direct Taxes Code - DTC 2009 - Impact on Salaried Class, Individuals, etc 1 721

4. Public Provident Fund PPF A/C - Little Known Facts                                  1 615

5. Government Securities Market in India & Bond Duration Management in India     1 118

6. Currency Futures in India-UPDATE-NSE & MCX to launch trading in 3 new currency pairs 1 112

Friday 5 February 2010

OIL SUBSIDY BURDEN-Why The Kirit Parikh Committee Recommendations Should Be Taken Seriously By The Government-VRK100-05022010

 


OIL SUBSIDY BURDEN:
Why The Kirit Parikh Committee Recommendations
Should Be Taken Seriously By The Government?


Rama Krishna Vadlamudi 

February 5, 2010

What is Oil Subsidy?

In India, fuel oils – petrol, diesel and kerosene and domestic LPG cylinders are sold at a price much lesser than their cost price. The subsidy is the most in case of diesel and PDS Kerosene. The prices at which public sector oil marketing companies (OMCs) have to sell the prices of these petroleum products are set by the Government of India. Public Sector OMCs – IOC, BPCL and HPCL – do not have the freedom to sell at a price over and above the cost price. Successive governments at the Centre have been prevaricating on the issue of oil subsidy for more than seven to eight years. The oil subsidy all these years has run into lakhs of crores of rupees.

India depends on imported oil to an extent of about 80 per cent of its total requirements. Crude oil prices have gone up substantially from a level of USD 20 per barrel in 2002 to an all-time peak of around USD 148 a barrel in July 2008 and plunged to a low of USD 35 per barrel by December 2008 before rising to the present level of around USD 73 per barrel (around 1.00 AM IST today) on the Nymex. Nymex crude oil price is the most widely tracked price in the world.

Oil subsidy is the difference between the fuel cost incurred by the OMCs and the sale price. As given above, crude oil price has gone up by up to four times in the last eight years. Fearing inflation and political backlash from low-income and middle classes, the Governments have done precious little to cut down this oil subsidy all these years. The Central Government lacks the political will to cut down them, which has adversely impacted India’s fiscal deficit.

How much is the subsidy burden?

The oil subsidy burden for OMCs is the most for Kerosene, which has been kept at an artificially lower price of Rs 9/litre for several years. The kerosene subsidy works out to around Rs 18/litre. The subsidy burden amounts to Rs 4.70/litre for petrol and around Rs 2.30/litre for diesel and around Rs 290 in case of an LPG cylinder. The downstream OMCs have been making huge losses for several years due to this heavy burden on them. 

The compensation for this subsidy has been coming from the Central Government partially and some portion is coming from upstream PSU companies, ONGC, GAIL India and Oil India Limited (OIL). As a result of this heavy oil subsidy burden, all these public sector have been suffering massive losses despite the compensation from Government in the form of oil bonds, which have to be sold by OMCs to meet their working capital requirements.

The total under-recoveries (a euphemism for subsidies) for six years between 2003-04 and 2008-09 amount to Rs 2.99 lakh crores – out of which, diesel accounts for Rs 1.21 lakh crore; while PDS kerosene, domestic LPG and petrol account for Rs 92,800 crore, Rs 68,000 lakh crore and Rs 17,400 crore respectively for the six-year period. From the total of these six years subsidies, around 60 per cent is from 2007-08 and 2008-09 only.

The burden of this oil burden is shared by the Government with Rs 1.42 lakh crore in the form of oil bonds and by three upstream public sector oil companies (ONGC, OIL and GAIL) to an extent of Rs 1.01 lakh crore in the form of a subsidy sharing formula for the six-year period. The OMCs have absorbed losses to the tune of Rs 56,000 crore.

Who are the beneficiaries of this oil subsidy?

The political spin given to justify the continuance of these subsidies is that the burden will be very high on the poor and low income group classes. The government wants to insulate the  domestic consumers from volatile oil prices. However, the biggest beneficiaries are the rich classes who have got a vested interest in keeping the subsidies intact. In a city like Bombay, all the wealthy, people in positions of power, big executives and well-heeled people use their own cars or hired taxis to travel long distances – like from Borivali to Nariman Point, the one-way distance of which is around 35 km by road. They use their own BMWs, Mercs, Innovas or other gas guzzlers. 

The public transport is extremely poor in Bombay. The question that comes to your mind is: Do these affluent people deserve this burden? As prices are below cost, we do not have any responsibility towards environment and we tend to consume more of these fuels and increasing the release of green house gases into the climate affecting the pollution levels in the country.

What is the cost of this oil subsidy to the economy?

As mentioned above, the OMCs have absorbed losses to an extent of Rs 56,000 crore for six years between 2003-04 and 2008-09; which means these oil subsidies have crippled them completely. These losses have forced them to slow down their investments in creating new capacities or participate in new exploration activities. Even upstream PSU oil companies had to share a burden of Rs 1.01 lakh crore in these six years. This has also hampered the ability of these companies to make new investments.

Our dependence on oil imports is going to increase to 90 per cent (from the present 80 per cent) by the end of 2030 which would be extremely perilous for our country which is on a high growth trajectory. This clearly indicates the poverty of ideas from India’s political classes, who have really disappointed the Indian masses. Our Prime Minister is fond of telling the people that we have the potential to achieve double-digit growth, but he never tells us how he is planning to do that miracle with woeful infrastructure and dithering policies.

The cost of this oil subsidy (the fancy term used as the official lingo for oil subsidies is under recoveries) is on the common man (aam admi) only as he is the ultimate bearer of this subsidy in the form of higher fiscal deficit.  OMCS have not been able to upgrade their fuels to higher Bharat IV norms (cleaner fuels from an environment point of view) and they could not create any new capacities for cleaner fuels. And they are not yet ready to meet the deadline for Bharat IV norms (in line with Euro IV norms).

While private sector companies, like Reliance Industries, Essar Oil and Videocon Industries, have made large investment in exploration and created big refining capacities; OMCs, ONGC and Oil India have not been able to make much headway as far as new investments are concerned. With lesser investment for several years, ONGC pays an income tax of around 32 per cent (of its Profit Before Tax); whereas Reliance Industries pays around 20 per cent only. The big difference is due to RIL’s high depreciation resulting from higher investments as compared to ONGC.

With lesser investments from public sector behemoths, the country’s dependence on imported oil, instead of reducing, has gone up substantially. The result is that India is poor in energy security and we are vulnerable to volatile crude oil prices and the politics of OPEC and oil world. This lack of energy security will be heavy on India as we are susceptible to shenanigans that are played out in case of wars in the Middle East Asia or the kind of oil shocks we witnessed in the early part of 1970s and 2008 when oil reached a peak of around USD 148 a barrel. While China has been investing strategically in Africa and Latin America for their raw materials needs, we have failed to make any attempts at energy security. 

The only minister who made some noises about energy security and travelled across the US is Mani Shankar Aiyar a few years back. But, this dynamic minister was removed from his position for reasons best known to the Congress party. If my memory is correct C Raja Mohan, an expert on defence affairs, was writing about energy security in 1993 in a column he used to publish in The Hindu in those days. In that article of 1993, he strongly advocated that India should woo Bangladesh for its vast gas reserves. We did not seem to have done much in this regard. 

However, the government of Khaleeda Zia, who is extremely hostile to India, has not helped matters much. Only the Tatas had tried to tap Bangladesh’s potential in natural resources. But even they could not make much headway there, I think. Now, with a friendly Haseena Begum in power, we can be optimistic about some progress in this regard if our government takes any initiative towards exploiting their gas reserves.

What is the difference between under recoveries and losses of OMCs?

Refining of crude oil is a process industry where crude oil constitutes around 90% of the total cost. Since value added is relatively small, determination of individual product-wise prices becomes problematic. Internationally, there is not much of a difference between the sale price of diesel and kerosene; whereas, petrol prices are lesser than that of diesel/kerosene by about four per cent! In India, our policy is just reverse. While the sale price of petrol is the highest and that of PDS kerosene is the lowest. And one fails to understand what kind of logic is there in following such a distorted policy.

The OMCs are currently sourcing their products from the refineries on import parity basis which then becomes their cost price. The difference between the cost price and the realized price represents the under-recoveries of the OMCs. The under-recoveries as computed above are different from the actual profits and losses of the oil companies as per their published results. The latter take into account other income streams like dividend income, pipeline income, inventory changes, profits from freely priced products and refining margins in the case of integrated companies. OMCs have been showing nominal profits due to sale of their cross-holdings in other oil companies.

What are the demerits of following such a skewed oil pricing policy by the Government?

1.     The public sector OMCs and upstream oil companies have suffered financially as their balance sheet strength has deteriorated considerably and they have lost their competitive edge at the market place
2.   The working capital loans of the public sector OMCs has gone up from Rs 23,000 crore in 2004-05 to Rs 1.07 lakh crore by December 2009 – forcing them to borrow heavily from banks with massive rise in interest costs. Moreover, the government is extremely slow in granting oil bonds to the OMCs resulting in the heavy bleeding of these companies.
3.   The adhoc system has resulted in speculation, hoarding and adulteration of diesel with kerosene which is available at a cheaper rate or Rs 9 per litre compared to a high price of Rs 35 per litre for diesel
4.   Even domestic LPG cylinders are diverted for commercial and industrial purposes
5.     The private sector oil companies, Reliance Industries, Essar Oil and Shell India have closed their retail petroleum outlets
6.   The less expensive fuel cost has made the users complacent about the perils of green house gases and users have failed to understand the reasons for saving fossil fuels
7.    The artificially low fuel prices have encouraged auto manufacturers to be complacent about developing fuel-efficient vehicles in India

What will happen if we do not raise domestic prices of sensitive petro products in line with rise in world crude oil prices?

At a crude oil price of USD 80/barrel, the total under-recoveries of OMCs on sale of petrol, diesel, LPG and PDS kerosene work out to Rs.1,57,000 crore by 2020-21. If oil prices rise by 25 per cent to USD 100/barrel, the under-recoveries will rise higher by 77 per cent. Likewise if oil prices rise to USD 120/barrel (50 per cent increase) the under-recoveries will rise by 155 per cent. Higher the growth rate of GDP and longer the period beyond 2020-21, the much higher will be the under-recoveries. Can India’s economy absorb such shocks in future?

What is Kirit Parikh Committee and why did the Government set up the Committee?

India’s consumption of petroleum products has recorded an annual compound growth rate of around four per cent between 2002-03 and 2008-09. This is in line with India’s GDP growth which has reached levels of between six and nine per cent during the period. At this rate of growth, our dependence on oil imports is projected to grow to 90 per cent (from the present 80 per cent). The volatility in international crude oil prices has been a big headache for the Government in fixing the prices of the four sensitive petroleum products, namely, diesel, petrol, PDS kerosene and domestic LPG.

In the background of this heavy oil subsidy, Government of India has set up a committee to look into the problem and suggest a way out of this logjam. The expert group has been asked to submit its recommendations for a viable and sustainable pricing policy of the four petro products, which constitute 63 per cent of the country’s total consumption of petro products.  An expert group, under the chairmanship of Kirit Parikh, a former member of the Planning commission, was set up at the end of August 2009 by the  Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. The group submitted its report on February 2, 2010.  

What are the recommendations of Kirit Parikh Committee?

1.     Domestic petroleum product prices have to reflect that of international prices. The government should allow pass-through of international oil prices to domestic users. This will enable the public sector OMCs and upstream oil companies to remain financially stable and solvent.
2.   There is no justification for continuance of subsidy for diesel and petrol and as such their prices should be raised by Rs 2.33 per litre and Rs 4.72 per litre respectively
3.   An additional excise duty of Rs 80,000 per vehicle should be levied on diesel car owners
4.   Smartcards should be used to provide subsidy to the target/needy group on kerosene and 14.2 LPG cylinders. Subsidy on LPG cylinders should be discontinued immediately except for the below the poverty line households.
5.    The price of kerosene should be increased by Rs 6 per litre and that of LPG by Rs 100 per cylinder. The kerosene price increase should be in line with the nominal growth in agricultural GDP. LPG price should be increased in line with per capita income.
6.   The government’s policy of incurring a cost of Rs 1.42 lakh crore towards compensating the OMCs for the under recoveries is a complete failure. The compensation burden has reached a level of 25 per cent of total revenue receipts in 2008-09, which is totally unviable and perilous to the long-term health of the economy.

Whether the Government will accept and implement these recommendations?

This is a million-dollar question considering the spiraling food inflation and the fear of the political repercussions for the ruling Government. To examine this aspect further, let us go back a little and see what the successive governments have done since the first Oil Shock of 1973. The Administered Price Mechanism (APM) existed from 1976. And it was abandoned in 2002. The then NDA government said it would link the domestic prices with that of international levels. It had followed this free policy for a few months and could not muster the courage to follow further its own policy when world oil prices started rising in the wake of the invasion of Iraq by the George Bush-led USA and other friendly countries, like, Great Britain.

In 2005, Rangarajan Committee was set up to examine the taxation and pricing policies. But the government had kept the report in cold storage. Another committee headed by BK Chaturvedi was constituted to examine the oil pricing policy in 2008. Not much has happened since then. Now, we have another committee to bother about.

If one goes by the experience of the past, it is very difficult to believe that the Government will bite the bullet and start tightening the belt by implementing these latest recommendations. Simply, the political classes do not have the courage to take decisions that are in the long-term interest of the nation. They are looking toward the next elections; but not the next generation. Basically, the decision will have to be a political one, but not an economic one.

The most important conclusion of this Kirit Parikh panel is that Indian Economy only has been bearing this massive oil burden through higher fiscal deficit which would push up the interest cost of the government and the people have to bear the burden in one way or the other. There is no benefit to any one by following the existing opaque pricing policies for these four sensitive petro products. The panel finds no compelling reason to justify the continuing subsidies for diesel and petrol. 

One only hopes that the Government will muster all political courage and take the recommendations seriously and implement them in letter and spirit in order to encourage transparency, viability of OMCs, investment in exploration and production activities and reduce the fiscal burden keeping the long-term interest of nation in high priority.


- - -

ABBREVIATIONS USED:

BPCL                  : Bharat Petroleum Copn Ltd
HPCL                 : Hindustan Petroleum Corpn Ltd
IOC                     : Indian Oil Corpn Ltd
Nymex                : New York Mercantile Exchange
OMC                    : Oil Marketing Companies (public sector)
PDS                     : Public Distribution System


You can read the above article on SCRIBD, just click: